Deefinately going with a revision
The thing is, I've had RNY, I know what it's like and now that I've had the DS and know what it's like, I know the difference. The difference is that the DS is so far superior to RNY that RNY is butchering in comparison and it's butchering that there is no need to have to suffer; as there are better alternatives. The fact that more surgeons don't know this or tell their patients this shows their greed and lack of caring about their patients health and well being; IMO it's disgusting. They are trading their patients quality of life for money, because they're too damn lazy to learn the facts and get trained to do the DS.
I know this much better than anyone I've met anywhere or who posts on OH. I lived RNY for 28 years, I made RNY work for 15, with no help from the RNY, in fact it made it more difficult, but I made it work anyway. All I want to do is let people know what choices they really have, if they choose RNY anyway, that's OK with me, it's not my stomach being butchered again and it's not me having to live the RNY nightmare again.
But because of what I know now, I feel a great responsibility to let people know what they're getting into and what they're missing. The choice is still up to them, I'm just telling them what I've learned and what I've been through to get here. What people do with that is totally up to them.
Kerry
Because of your story, and experience, and others like you, who have had to have revision surgery, and the path that led you to the DS IS EXACTLY THE REASONING BEHIND ME WANTING A DS, NOT A REVISION TO MY EXSISTING RNY.
(I think I will post this to my blog as well, once I have the rest of my paperwork from the doctors to back up my personal facts.)
Personally, the biggest thing for me was alot of soul searching, and feeling of failure.
I do not want:
1) a pouch
I DO WANT:
1) a 'normal' stomach
2) a pyloric valve that fuctions
3) to be able to drink with my meals
4) To be able to take ibuprofen, anti inflammatories... I'm not getting any younger & aches & & pains will happen
5) eat like a 'normal' person in public
6) eat more fat
My list goes on, but these are the ones for ME that top the list.
Everyone's choice is an individual one. I completely respect that. TOTALLY.
-Jamie
RNY 2/26/2002 DS 12/29/2011
HW 317 SW 263 BMI 45.1
SW 298 CW 192 BMI 32.9~60% EWL
LW 151 in 2003
TT 4/9/2003
Normal BMI 24.8 is my GOAL!!!
GBP (RNY) 2/26/02 298 lbs, TT 4/9/03 151 lbs, DS 12/29/11
HW 317 SW 263 BMI 45.1/CW 192 BMI 32.9/GW 145 ~ Normal BMI 24.8
**Revision Journey started 3/2009 Approved 12/12/11**
I had RNY for 28 years and there is no way in hell I would let some surgeon butcher my stomach and turn it into a pouch again, no way in hell. There's no good reason you have to submit to RNY, you really should study the DS, it's far superior in any measurable way and the quality of eating and life you get with DS is also superior to what you will have with RNY.
I know this because I've had both RNY and DS, you can read all the details on my profile if you want to know what I've been through. The long and short of it is that RNY sucks compared to DS, no BS.
I have nothing to gain here, it makes no difference to me what you do, but I'm telling you that RNY is nothing more than a money maker for your surgeon, it is not the best WLS. And your surgeon is a money grubbing low life if he hasn't truthfully explained the difference in RNY and DS to you in detail as far as long term weight loss, quality of life post op and resolution of Type II and all other co-morbidity's.
Kerry
Now, granted, I have not had a revision from RNY to DS yet, I feel strongly about the subject as well.
-Jamie
RNY 2/26/2002 DS 12/29/2011
HW 317 SW 263 BMI 45.1
SW 298 CW 192 BMI 32.9~60% EWL
LW 151 in 2003
TT 4/9/2003
Normal BMI 24.8 is my GOAL!!!
GBP (RNY) 2/26/02 298 lbs, TT 4/9/03 151 lbs, DS 12/29/11
HW 317 SW 263 BMI 45.1/CW 192 BMI 32.9/GW 145 ~ Normal BMI 24.8
**Revision Journey started 3/2009 Approved 12/12/11**
Kerry