Two pregnancy-related articles in Medscape (not WLS specific)

Andrea U.
on 12/30/09 5:31 am - Wilson, NC
Just FYI cause that's how I roll.  Or something.  Not specific to obesity whatsoever (which, hey! is kinda nice to be normal, eh?)

Linked titles take you to Medscape if you want to read it there.  I've copied the entire article, but I hate non-cited references.

Herbal Product Use Common in Pregnancy, May Pose Risks to Fetus

December 30, 2009 — Use of herbal products during the period just before and during pregnancy is common among US women. Because so little is known about the effects of herbals on the developing fetus, however, healthcare providers should counsel their patients to err on the side of caution and avoid their use, according to an analysis published online December 28 in the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

"Herbal use surrounding pregnancy raises particular concerns, because many herbals are marketed specifically for symptoms that occur commonly during pregnancy, such as nausea and vomiting," write Cheryl S. Broussard, PhD, from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta, Georgia, and colleagues. "More importantly, our ignorance of the potential harm to the pregnant woman is complicated by our even greater ignorance of the potential effects on fetal safety."

In this study, the researchers sought to estimate the prevalence and patterns of herbal use among US women immediately before and during pregnancy.

They used data from the National Birth Defects Prevention Study, an ongoing, population-based, case-control study involving case infants with major structural birth defects and control infants without such defects, conducted in 10 centers across the United States.

Their analysis included 4239 women who delivered infants without major birth defects between 1998 and 2004.

A computer-assisted telephone interview was used to collect data from mothers about exposures in the 3 months before pregnancy and throughout pregnancy to delivery. The women were asked: "Did you use any herbs or folk medicines to treat any medical conditions, to lose weight, or just to keep you healthy?"

The researchers found that 462 mothers (10.9%) reported use of an herbal product 3 months before or during pregnancy. During pregnancy, the overall prevalence was 9.4% and was highest during the first trimester (6.9%). A substantial proportion of women took herbal products during the second (5.1%) and third (5.2%) trimesters.

The use of herbal products increased with age, with a higher prevalence associated with age older than 30 years, and herbal use was also highest among women with more than a high school education and those with a household income of $20,000 or more per year.

The most commonly used herbals early in pregnancy were ginger, probably because it is believed to prevent nausea and vomiting, and ephedra, the authors report. Later in pregnancy, herbal teas and chamomile were most commonly used.

Other commonly used herbals were cranberry extract, raspberry leaf, mint or peppermint, and primrose oil.

Herbal Product Use in First Trimester Raises Safety Concerns

The fact that use of herbal products was greatest during the first trimester of pregnancy raises concerns about fetal safety because this is a critical period of fetal organ development, the authors write.

They note that the US Food and Drug Administration withdrew ephedra from the market in April 2004 because of concerns about cardiovascular effects including increased blood pressure and irregular heart rhythm in adults — effects that could have implications for the fetus.

A limitation of this analysis is that the mothers self-reported their exposure. Another is the variable time to interview, as one fifth of the mothers were interviewed 12 to 24 months after their estimated date of delivery. These might have led to exposure misclassification or lack of specificity in defining the mother's exposure because the interviews relied on women's recall of exposures up to 3 years in the past, the authors note.

Knowledge of the effects of herbals on the developing fetus is "remarkably limited," the authors write. In addition, it is difficult to ascertain the ingredients in herbal products with any degree of reliability because of the nature of the herbal product industry, which may label ingredients inaccurately or change the blend of their ingredients. Finally, despite their widespread use, many pregnant women who use herbals do not tell their physicians.

It is therefore critical that risks and relative safety of herbal products in pregnancy be studied and that more data on the fetal risks associated with these products be accumulated, the authors say.

In the meantime, healthcare providers should ask their patients about their use of herbals "in a routine and nonjudgmental fashion," and they should also counsel their patients that the fact that a substance is natural does not necessarily mean that it is safe for the fetus.

"Providers also should inform patients that it would be prudent to err on the side of caution regarding use of these products during and surrounding pregnancy, because little is known about their potential risks," the authors conclude.

Dr. Broussard has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. Published online December 28, 2009.

 

Clinical Risk Factors May Predict Depression During Pregnancy


December 30, 2009 — Clinical risk factors that may be easily identified during routine obstetric examination may help predict depression during pregnancy, according to the results of a review of 57 studies reported in the January 2010 issue of the American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology.

"Prenatal care providers are uniquely suited to address antepartum depression," write Christie A. Lancaster, MD, MS, from the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor, and colleagues. "First of all, providers have already captured their target population, because most women will use obstetric services at some point during their pregnancies. Providers also have multiple opportunities to assess, treat, and follow-up with patients, as obstetric visits are recurring during a several-month span."

Based on an English-language search of the literature from 1980 through 2008, the reviewers aimed to examine risk factors for antepartum depressive symptoms that could be detected in routine obstetric care. Selection criteria were studies evaluating the association between antepartum depressive symptoms and 1 or more risk factors. Two masked, independent reviewers assessed the overall trend of evidence for each potential risk factor.

There were 57 studies identified that met selection criteria. Factors associated with a greater likelihood of antepartum depressive symptoms in bivariate analyses were maternal anxiety, life stress, history of depression, lack of social support, unintended pregnancy, Medicaid insurance, domestic violence, lower income, lower education, smoking, single status, and poor relationship quality.

In multivariate analyses, factors that continued to show a significant association with depressive symptoms were life stress, lack of social support, and domestic violence.

"Our results demonstrate several correlates that are consistently related to an increased risk of depressive symptoms during pregnancy," the review authors write.

"Our results are important for practicing clinicians because they identify risk factors that can be assessed during routine obstetric care," they add. "For current practice, providers should especially consider the likelihood of depressive symptoms in women with these risk factors, such as report of domestic violence or a lack of social support during pregnancy."

Limitations of the studies reviewed include significant heterogeneity among studies; lack of diagnostic assessments for depression; use of different cutoff points on screening tools; limited sample size; and observational, cross-sectional design in most studies. Limitations of the data analysis include possible publication bias, review of only studies published in English, and subjective assessment of quality.

"Future work should address how well our current obstetric screening forms capture these constructs and how we can use risk factor identification to improve screening efficiency and accuracy and to enhance our clinical assessments during pregnancy," the study authors conclude.

"For example, future research studies could evaluate the likelihood of major depressive disorder in women with positive depression screens that do or do not have these additional risk factors."

The Robert Wood Johnson Clinical Scholars Program supported this study.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;202:5-14.


 

Most Active
Recent Topics
Post Preganancy Weight Gain
nko_88 · 3 replies · 1417 views
Procare prenatal vitamins?
liz52408 · 2 replies · 951 views
Glucose test
marianacc · 9 replies · 1456 views
×