Could it be that he sees errors in the way of the head-in-the-sand, superstitious, religious-right Republicans?

HAVEN'T SEEN IT & DON'T WANT TO SEE IT.IT IS NOT FACTUAL & MICHAEL MOORE IS A JOKE! HE RECENTLY INVITED BUSH TO SEE HIS MOVIE THEN HE WOULD NOT ATTEND THE SHOWING IN TEXAS. I THNK GWB IS DOING A GREAT JOB AS PRESIDENT AND PLAN ON VOTING FOR HIM AGAIN. I DON'T AGREE WITH HIM ON ALL ISSUES, BUT I THINK HE IS A DECISIVE LEADER WHO DOESN'T FIP FLOP ON HIS DECISIONS EVEN WHEN THE MEDIA & POLLS ARE AGAIST HIM.IF HE DECEIVED US ON IRAQ & WMD, THEM CLINTON & CONGRESS DECEIVED US TOO. THE WORLD IS BETTER OFF WITHOUT SH & NO ONE CAN DENY IT. I CERTAINLY WOULDN'T WANT SOMEONE LIKE KERRY WHO CHAGES HIS MIND FASTER THAN I CHANGE UNDERWEAR BASED ON WHETHER HIS SPECIFIC DECISION WILL HELP OR HINDER HIM.DID ANYONE SEE MSNBC'S SPECIAL ON KERRY TODAY? IT EXPOSED HIM FOR THE OPPORTUNIST THAT HE IS.WHY DO YOU THINK HE MARRIED TWICE TO VERY WEALTHY WOMEN?HE ONLY SPENT 4 MONTHS IN VIETNAM AND HASN'T ACCOMPLISHED ANYTHING IN THE SENATE OR ANYWHERE ELSE.CHECK OUT HIS VOTING RECORD.AND BY THE WAY, SHAME ON RON REAGAN FOR USING HIS FATHER'S EULOGY TO MAKE A POLITICAL INUENDO.HIS FATHER AND HIM DISAGGREED ON EVERYTHING BUT HE'S USING HIS FATHER'S NAME NOW TO BASH BUSH &THE REPUBLIC PARTY. COULD IT BE THAT HE'S A LITTLE JEOLOUS OF ANOTHER SON OF A FORMER PRESIDENT?

GWB attacked a country that didn't even have anything to do with the terrorists. That's not what I call strong on terrorism. In fact, given that there was no Al Qaeda/Iraq link you can be sure that the invasion of Iraq did nothing more than make MORE terrorists. Now, in the eyes of Muslim extremists, we are a country that attacked a sovereign Muslim nation with no good reason. I'm sorry, but I truly believe that Bush's actions have done more to stir up anti-American hate and more to further the cause and resolve of the terrorists. And you know what? I'm not buying the bad intelligence story. Scott Ritter and Hans Blix were both saying, BEFORE THE INVASION, that Iraq didn't have anything serious enough to make them an imminent threat. Richard Clark and Paul O'Neil have both said that when it came to intelligence, Bush didn't want to hear anything that would weaken his case against Iraq. So we invaded Iraq, who was not at all a threat, and we're stuck there. And our military resources are stretch to the limit. You mentioned Iran and North Korea. How are we going to be able to deal with them now that we're stuck in Iraq? And as for the economic recovery..... did you notices that income has not increased at all. And jobs? We're still more than a million jobs down from when he took office. This "economic recovery" is a hard sell.

I disagree. I am glad GWB was so strong and continues to be strong on terrorism, the economy is improving, my taxes are lower (and I am in the middle of the middle class as it is possible to be!) and I definetly don't want to kowtow to our supposed 'allies' France and Germany. France has been against virtually every U.S. position since WWII. They are not a serious world power. But I have concerns about Iraq and how it was handled. And I don't think the current discussion and Fahrenheit 9-11 is even asking the right questions. If anything, it almost makes it too easy for Bush supporters becasue the movie is so obviously a distortion. The issue is not whether Bush lied - the issue is that we went to war based on bad intellegence! Thats bad enough! Not just our own but virtually every other nation's as well! There may very well be countries in the future that DO pose a serious threat (Iran, North Korea) but we will be constrained on dealing with them becasue of the bad intel on Iraq.

I don't think that the movie is just about making a case against the war. I think it's about making a case against GWB--and I think Moore delivers on many levels. And while there are some exaggerations, there is plenty of truth too. Why this country, after all that has happened and all that is still going wrong, needs anyone to make a case against GWB is beyond me. GWB has made is own case of why you shouldn't vote for him. If you don't see it, you're not paying attention.