Actually, Miss Mel... I DO think abortion should be "legal" in times of Rape, Incest, or if the mother's life is in danger. As I said before, I think women SHOULD have a choice. Women who are raped and involved in incest did NOT have a choice when it came to whether to have sex or not, so therefore I do feel they should have a choice as to whether to carry the baby or not. HOWEVER, a good majority of "unwanted" pregnancies happen because two people get together in bed and can't seem to think beyond the next ten minutes. They made their choice (the WRONG ONE) to have sex without the ability or desire to raise a baby, even though everyone with an IQ above 10 knows that babies do sometimes happen from having sex. They are unwilling to accept the possible consequences of their actions. Even though there are so many different forms of contraception available, they are even unwilling to use them. Do you really think that it's right to punish and murder an innocent unborn baby for that?? And you think the government should protect that right?? I don't think so! Second of all, wanting to protect human life is not "just a religious thing".. I think ANY American (religious or not) who saw someone's life in danger would want to do all they can to protect it. And it's especially true for those little innocent children who have no ability to protect themselves. And third, I think the argument that "if abortion is illegal it will still happen" is pretty stupid. Snorting Cocaine is illegal and still happens.. Robbing a bank is illegal and still happens.. Drunk driving is illegal and still happens ..(I could go on and on). Do you think we should legalize these things because "they happen anyway"? -Mike Pro-life, Anti-Kerry

Thank you Miss Mel for clarifying my point. Mike, I didn't say you couldn't express or share your opinion, you just can't force people to live by your beliefs. When you say stay off the politics board and go to the Crocheting forum you're showing your misogenous side. Would you have said that if my name was Kevin instead of Kathy? Go ahead. Get angry. You sure don't have logic or facts to support your points, so go ahead and yell and call people names.

Ok, we can agree to disagree STILL PRO-CHOICE AND ANTI-BUSH!

Ok.. I consider myself fairly intelligent, but I admit there's something here I need help understanding. All these Kerry supporters keep saying that Iraq was NOT a threat. Everyone (Bush, Kerry, probably the majority of the American public..) Thought Saddam had WMD. Now, the second we find out that he didn't, every democrat in the country is saying "That Bush is a no-good liar.. he SAID there were WMDs just cuz he likes war and wanted to get rid of Saddam. And Saddam was not a threat to the US".. But now we find out about these 380 TONS of explosives.. wouldn't explosives be considered WMD?? I mean a weapon of mass distruction is for the purpose of killing lots of people. If Saddam only wanted to kill ONE person, wouldn't a gun be a better choice?? And wouldn't Saddam having 380 TONS of explosives be considered a huge danger to America?? Just wondering what the conservatives think about this?? -Mike PRO-BUSH ALL THE WAY!

Sigh! There I go again. I keep forgetting that spin trumps the facts these days.