A post for No Surrender

Lisa H.
on 11/11/04 6:33 am - Bartlett, TN
Yes, thats the tolerant, inclusive left. Just attack people who don't agree with you. I guess thats your best option though since your candidates ideas were so soundly rejected in the election.
Kelle W
on 11/15/04 10:25 pm - Atlanta, GA
Why do you assume I voted for Kerry? And if you think that only 51% of the nation voting for you is "soundly" winning the election, perhaps you'd better reconsider. Almost exactly half of this country would have rather had Kerry than Bush.....and the people who don't support Bush are not going away either...Everything that goes in the toilet in the next 4 years can be definitively placed at the feet of the republican party. Come back and talk to me about "options" then....
Mike F.
on 11/16/04 1:48 am - West Jordan, UT
Well, Kelle dear.. This election is the first one since 1988 with George Bush Sr. that the president won the popular vote. Which means that Dubya won more soundly than Clinton did both terms. I guess that means that MORE than half the country would have rather not had Clinton.. Gee, and I thought he was such an impressive man.. -Mike
Kathy M.
on 11/24/04 6:21 am - rockaway, ny
Let's at least get our rhetoric correct. To call the left 'inclusive' means that we include (or agree with) most of the country. To put us down you want to use the term exclusive, meaning we exclude or reject the beliefs and opinions of our fellow citizens. Please refer back to the Republican idealogues who issued the talking points you're trying to quote.
Lisa H.
on 11/28/04 8:24 am - Bartlett, TN
I was being sarcastic...its the left that likes to portray itself as inclusive when the reality is exactly the opposite.....as was so amply demonstrated in the previous post. You're right..the term exclusive is the accurate one!
Kathy M.
on 11/29/04 12:20 am - rockaway, ny
Sarcastic? Is that that what GW is being when he says nuculer instead of nuclear? I don't understand why you feel it's exclusive, it's anything but. We have some of the wealthiest and poorest, Gay and Straight, we include every religion (not just one!) and every race. I listen to the talking points on either side, so I was very familiar with the ones you were trying to use. If you were trying to be sarcastic it wasn't obvious. Maybe you could give us a clue next time.
Most Active
Recent Topics
×