Gummy Bear vs. Saline
Hi everyone! What are your thoughts and inputs on the two types.
I heard there is a costly aftercare with the Gummy Bears to check for ruptures. Requiring a scan that insurance doesn't cover and can start around $1K every year. But they are more natural looking....
Saline-no aftercare but so obvious if you have a rupture...deflation...but rippling.
Input please!!
Thanks...you are all a great bunch of people on here.
aloha,
michelle
hi linda,
i live on kauai. which island are you on? i've been to consultations with Dr. Tiner(in Pasadena), Dr. Phan(he's on Kauai and Maui), Dr. Quiroz(via email i sent him pics) and Dr. Sauceda(again via email). I even flew to Oahu and did a consult with a doc there but after speaking to him in person, I found out that he doesn't do breast lifts.
keep in touch! we can do this journey together.......
on 10/13/09 12:17 pm - Haleiwa, HI
I live on the North Shore near 3 tables, and I am in Monterrey right now! i can tell you that there is nothing to be afraid of at all! Many people speak English, the hotel is fantastic, and I cannot rave enough about Dr sauceda. I have a ton of info on my blog about him, my trip, etc. www.livingtheskinnylife.blogspot.com . You can do a search for Dr Sauceda or Monterrey on my blog, and you will probably get more info that you will need! LOL!
Happy searching!
Jessica
on 10/13/09 12:25 pm - Haleiwa, HI
Jessica
Hi. Let me clarify a few terms on the types of implants:
Saline: these are filled with sal****er, and if they rupture the saline is harmlessly absorbed by the body.
Silicone, cohesive gel: these implants are filled with a 3rd-generation gel that is much thicker than gel used in previous implants. As such, it does not travel out of the implant as readily in case of rupture. Silicone migration was a problem with earlier generation implants.
Silicone, form-stable: these are the true "gummy bar" implants and are basically solid. The gel cannot migrate in these implants, and technically they cannot rupture. They are still awaiting FDA approval and they are suitable only for a very select group of patients. Dr Bill Adams in Dallas has done 500 cases as part fo a research study using "gummy bear" implants, and the special techniques to use them were discussed at a recent meeting I attended.
Rippling, rupture rates, and the "most natural feeling" are all highly dependant on the women's tissue (or lack of it) and her anatomy. No single implant is the best choice for everyone...proper implant choice requires a lot of careful planning and decisionmaking by both doc and patient.
Presently, an MRI study is recommended for patients with gel implants at 5 to 7 years. These scans may not be covered by INS. Since implants have a known rupture rate that goes up each year (the rate of rupture varies for different types of implant) you have to think about detecting rupture and having it treated, if needed.
The main manufacturers of the latest-generation implants, which have the lowest rupture rate of all, offer up to $3500 of financial assistance in case of rupture, and free product replacement (around $1900 per implant).
Implants placed outside of the U.S and Canada are not warrantied by either of the companies:
http://www.mentorcorp.com/breastsurgery/augmentation/cs_ba_w arranty-full-old.htm
and they have compelling reasons for doing this.
Hope this helps.
Plastic Surgery
Houston, Texas
www.DrLoMonaco.com
www.BodyLiftHouston.com