Most of the research to this point has been on animals - there's lots of that. But in the end, the same research that prove WLS works well applies to intermittent fasting - they both involved a huge calorie reduction. WLS isn't technically fasting, but it might as well be due to the teensy amount of food you can eat afterwards. WLS is just surgically enforced fasting. There is no mechanical difference between the two mechanisms.

I ask you: do you believe there is any kind of physical or medical benefit to the surgery itself? What I mean is, it simply forces you to eat a lot less. Do you think that you would get the same results if you just followed the post-surgical diet from WLS without getting the surgery? Or do you think there's something magical going on?

At 5 months out, I'm about 2 lbs from goal. I'm struggling to eat well, and I'm just tired of the "same old-same old"!

I got some wonderful advice about increasing my calories gradually so I can head to maintenance.

I know I need to continue protein first, then dense carbs like vegetables. I am not a big dairy person, other than Premier Protein and fat-free cheddar; oh, and Triple Zero yogurt.

Is there a link or something that would help?

Thanks

Thanks for the heads up, Gwen. I go for my bloodwork next month so I think I will keep at it and see what happens. I have added B12, iron and Vitamin D supplements so maybe it won't be bad.

I love Dr Salameh!

I checked out the nutrients a while back and they do not meet the ASMBS recommendations for WLS-people. No matter what they claim on their site to the contrary!

I agree about Celebrate. I plan on getting my vitamins/supplements/shakes, etc. from them. For me, simplicity and routine are keys to compliance. Their website covers all you need to know!