Fast food nutrition: this can't be right?!
I don't eat fast food, but I've been having naughty thoughts about fried chicken lately. Naughty, naughty thoughts. So I'm online and decided to look up nutrition information for Popeyes fried chicken. My thinking was: if I complete my cardio this weekend, I might have some...I'll pair it with some home-cooked steamed vegetables...not because I think the veggies erase the horrible nutrition of the fast food, but just so I can fill up with minimal additional calories. According to Popeyes' website, a fried chicken drumstick has 110 calories. The information for KFC is similar: 130. Even if I take home the leg and weigh it to make sure it is the recommended size, this CAN'T be right. A tablespoon of oil has 120 calories. Deep frying soaks up so much oil, I can't imagine the leg has less than a tablespoon...right? That would mean the leg itself and breading have negative calories! I know the lesson is that fast food is evil and to just stay away...but I was wondering what your take on this nutrition information is. How would that be possible?