Hey Paul,
Pot shots welcome, I'm just brainstorming here.
On Rapid Response Telecom Infrastructure Recovery:
I am rather familiar with this area. In fact, I was involved in the design and construction of the new 911 dispatch center for Williamson County (Just North of Austin), and was mildly involved in Katrina recovery. Katrina was interesting, by the way. The wireless carriers, Verizon and CIngular etc, Are very proud of how fast they had their networks back up and running. They have DRT's (Disaster Recovery Teams) which are made up of techs and engineers from all over the country. When something like Katrina happens, they load up a few trucks with generators, antennas and COWs (Cell On Wheels, essentially a mobile cell site which can be deployed in a few hours), and haul ass for the area. They learned a few things from Katrina and are continuing to "harden" their networks in coastal areas based on knowledge gained from Katrina.
I was running a neighboring region for a tower company at the time, and we did not lose a single tower. A few ended up having to be replaced due to structural stress, but none fell down. A few other companies were not so lucky, but I was amazed how few actually came down. Most of the ones that did fail were caused by large heavy objects, like barges, floating into them. A few foundations failed on sites because the ground literally liquified under them, causing them to float up and then fall over.
To anyone worried about a tower near their house falling on them in a hurricane of tornado, I can assure you that your house will be dust in the wind long before the tower comes down. Ice storms are another story. A couple inches of ice and high winds will bring a tower down in quick fashion.
I'm not sure how I could turn emergency wireless response skills to global travel. I know of a few fixed wireless companies that specialize in that for oil rigs, diamond mines etc. However, it is a sideline for them only and is rather dangerous work when it does come up. It is very lucrative work, when it does come up.
On Wifi, yep, you nailed that one. The new thing is WiMax which looks to have traction. For the tech positions working in deployment etc, I have absolutely no passion for it. It is boring, tedious work. Now, if a company needed someone to travel around selling the technology to overseas companies and governments, that is another story. We, being the USA, are so far behind the other countries in this area that it is shameful. We have lost our edge in telecommunications. The Europeans and Asians are at least a decade ahead of us. Where Motorola use to be the global leader, companies like Nokia, Ericsson and Samsung have been crushing them for years with better, cheaper, more dynamic products and services. WiMax has hope to become a global technology. Let's hope so, because everyone from Intel, Motorola, MicroSoft, Cisco, Sprint, Lucent and a few other ginormous US companies are investing billions into it. The first deployments for Sprint/Nextel are up and running and look to be delivering as promised. I don't know if it is enough to save them from the admittedly clusterf&^k of a merger. Putting Sprint and Nextel together is like trying to get peace in the middle east, only there is hope for the middle east. Neither of their networks will ever play nice with the other, ever. Eventually, all their switches and cell sites will have to be redeployed, along with putting new handsets in every single customer's hand. Their only hope is to sell off the Nextel network to the government for homeland security use, which might actually happen.
Fixed point is interesting. I specifically have interest in wireless backhaul services and have seriously considered starting my own company to provide those services. With WiMax, the carriers may be able to do it within their own networks, but everyone is pretty sure that every tower out there is going to need a very fat pipe to it, if we are going to see the type of data and video services which are being developed. When I started in the wireless industry, the most T-1's needed at a site were 2 or 3. Today, urban sites often require 15 or more already and that number is expected to increases dramatically over the next decade. Optimally, there would be fiber optic connected to every tower. However, Fiber Optic is still very expensive and time consuming to deploy. Private fixed wireless networks linking towers together, and then back to a switch, are very viable now. Check out a company called FiberTower if you are interested. They have the most traction out the gate, but there is still plenty of room in the market. Again, just my opinions.
JP