A 10-year Experience with Laparoscopic Gastric Banding

Conclusions: LGB appeared promising during the first few years after its introduction, but results worsen over time, despite improvements in the operative technique and material. Only about 60% of the patients without major complication maintain an acceptable EWL in the long term. Each year adds 3-4% to the major complication rate, which contributes to the total failure rate. With a nearly 40% 5-year failure rate, and a 43% 7-year success rate (EWL >50%), LGB should no longer be considered as the procedure of choice for obesity. Until reliable selection criteria for patients at low risk for long-term complications are developed, other longer lasting procedures should be used.

http://link.springer.com/article/10.1381%2F09608920677782235 9

This is actually better than many banding studies.  :o/

We're going to be seeing a LOT of damage from bands in the next decade.  
All the people who think the surgery is "reversible" are going to be in for a big shock. 

That day is already here!  There are massive numbers of people with damage from the band.  Most of the long term issues seem to be esophageal damage and there is no fix for that.  :o(

And yet, there are people still getting bands left and right like they think they're immune to the problems inherent with gastric banding. I realize people like to think they're somehow special and if they "follow the rules" nothing but rainbows and butterflies will populate their lives. But it's delusional thinking. 

~Nic

People pretty much believe what they want to believe.  Very sad.  I am thrilled for the very small few who it does work for but they are the clear minority.  It is not common to keep a band 10 years.