Rex Ryan on CNN today talks about his long term success with his Lap Band

All weight loss surgeries don't work well long term RNY, Sleeve or Lap band for that matter, however if the patient continues a "healthy lifestyle" of diet and exercise, then regain will be tough, but  as obese people we did not get this way by leading a "healthy lifestyle", we had triggers, and when the Sleeve stretches out a bit long term and that hunger returns ...and it will....if the patient is not exercising every single day and dieting....the weight will come back with a vengeance.....One benefit of the lap band you can always get it adjusted to help out long term, if it is not damaged.

Naomi, the BAND doesn't get "damaged."  The BODY becomes damaged.  Saying that the "band gets damaged" downplays the severity of the situation.   I'm not trying to pick a fight, honestly. It's just that too many people think that their bodies will remain the same and the band will somehow be "damaged." 

The problem with the longevity of the band (or lack thereof) is that the body reacts to its presence by forming scar tissue and adhesions. So to be able to get the band adjusted long term, you'd have to have a body that doesn't make scar tissue or adhesions.  And most, if not all, human bodies do make scar tissue. It's just the way we're made. The scar tissue is a repair mechanism.  The manufacturers are saying that the band is not a lifetime device because of this very reason. As scar tissue builds up internally, there will be tethers and barriers that interfere with normal biologic function. It's almost a given. People really need to start taking this into account when choosing the band. 

You are right, scar tissue does cause issues for many people that have weight loss surgery including BYPASS, SLEEVE and LAP BAND. There are MANY people that have the Bypass that suffer from "Adhesion" type issues long term, this will include those that get the Sleeve or Lap band. 

Because the band is a foreign object those adhesions may cause pain for lap banders and other issues, but again MANY people with the Bypass, Sleeve and Lap band may never suffer from issues with adhesions. Some people form more scar tissue than others, so you can't SAY EVERYONE will have this problem....I had my old band for over 7 years and never had a "scar tissue issue".

Scar tissue forms every SINGLE time someone has ANY TYPE OF SURGERY, regardless if is weight loss surgery, in fact MANY people are NOT CANDIDATES for ANY TYPE OF WEIGHT LOSS SURGERY if they've had several open surgeries in the past, has NOTHING TO DO WITH THE LAP BAND.

Remember most of those LAWSUITS from Allergan are from those bogus 1800 clinics in California that sparked a congressional hearing and gave the lap band a bad rap..and everyone else that failed their bands...thought they could "jump" on the sue Allergan wagon...this is the good ole USA......

Special care should be considered for those who get the band, --IT DOES NOT CAUSE WEIGHT LOSS -- OR MAKE SOMEONE SICK UNLESS THERE ARE COMPLICATIONS AND THE BAND INSTALLED WRONG..... AND THAT IS ONE OF THE BIGGEST ISSUES WITH IT...AND MANY PEOPLE GET ANGRY ABOUT THIS WHICH IS THE MAIN COMPLAINT...BUT THESE PEOPLE SHOULD NOT GET THE BAND IN THE FIRST PLACE .

THE BAND ONLY HELPS BY REDUCING PORTIONS AND HELP DIMMING THE APPETITE......but most complications are not serious and does not have patients on feeding tubes like the Sleeve, RNY or the DS and does not disrupt their life and that is A FACT, most lap band complications are quickly fixed by either removing the band or unfilling it, when did vomiting, heartburn or reflux require intensive care? Those are 95 percent of the issues related to the band, These types of issues are annoying, but not dangerous.....THE BAND IS STILL SAFER than other weight loss surgeries.

The lap band is a specialized type weight loss surgery and does NOT work for everyone like the Bypass, the Bypass will work even if you don't do anything at least for the first 6 months, but many people don't realize this. But with Band you must have a diet and exercise plan right out of surgery --otherwise you don't lose nothing.

Again, you CAN'T STOP people from getting the band, the only way the lap band will be stopped IF surgeons can come up with a better SAFER technology that does not remove the stomach or rearrange the intestines, many people are still NOT willing to get more invasive weight loss surgeries and will still get the band even it means getting it removed/replaced or mechanical parts fixed.....

I disagree. The band has proven itself to be dangerous, much more so than divulged.  Complications are not resolved by band removal and it's not safer by any means. The band being implanted causes many more problems than people realize... until after they're damaged. 

 

Surgeons are starting to dissuade patients from getting bands and that's a good first step. I am happy for those of you for whom the band has worked, but there are far more who have been damaged permanently. It's apparent just in reading message boards how damaging the band really is. The sheer number failed band groups that exist... that's very telling and representative of what's happening in the world. 

I admit, though, at this point in my life, I wouldn't choose any WLS. I'm simply unwilling to risk any more health issues since the band already caused so much damage to my body.  I hope that medical science will be able to come up with a better, safer technology. The band was a bad idea from its inception, though, in my opinion. Anyone who knows anything about human anatomy would conclude that gastric banding is a disaster in the making. 

If you disagree than the band is SAFER then you need to get more education on other surgeries and focus on the whole picture of weight loss surgery instead of your personal hate for the lap band.

Many people are seeking a safer surgery that can be removed if issues arise and the lap band fit that category for many people.

If you disagree that adhesions and scar tissue can't cause complications in other weight surgeries here is a study of "Adhesions" and scar tissue that causes misery and pain for MANY post op Bypass folks which contributes to small bowel complications...

 

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3123682/

 

The publisher's final edited version of this article is available at Am J Surg See other articles in PMC that cite the published article.   Go to:

Abstract

Introduction

Gastric bypass remains the mainstay of surgical therapy for obesity. Abdominal pain after gastric bypass is common, and accounts for up to half of all postoperative complaints and emergency room visits. This manuscript reviews the most important causes of abdominal pain specific to gastric bypass and discusses management considerations.

Data Sources

The current surgical literature was reviewed using PubMed, with a focus on abdominal pain after gastric bypass and the known pathologies that underlie its pathogenesis.

Conclusions

The differential diagnosis for abdominal pain after gastric bypass is large and includes benign and life-threatening entities. Its diverse causes require a broad evaluation that should be directed by history and clinical presentation. In the absence of a clear diagnosis, the threshold for surgical exploration in patients with abdominal pain after gastric bypass should be low.

Keywords: Obesity, internal hernia, laparoscopy, abdominal pain, gastric bypass Go to:

Introduction, Epidemiology

The number of gastric bypass operations performed annually in the United States has increased dramatically over the past decade and is approaching 200,000 (1). While the benefits of gastric bypass are clear, this explosion in popularity is associated with a finite morbidity. Abdominal pain is one of the most common and vexing problems after gastric bypass. Anywhere from 15-30% of patients will visit the emergency room or require admission within three years of gastric bypass, and abdominal pain is the primary complaint in over half of these cases (2-4). Clinical presentation is highly variable and evaluation may be complicated by the fact that obese patients feel abdominal symptoms more intensely than lean subjects (5). The differential diagnosis of abdominal pain after gastric bypass is diverse and presents diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. Nonetheless, the importance of a thorough understanding of these diverse etiologies is underscored by a single center report documenting a decrease in readmissions after gastric bypass over years with alterations in operative technique based on observation of causes of readmission (4). An understanding of the pathogenesis of abdominal pain after gastric bypass can thus impact favorably on outcomes. This review focuses on causes of abdominal pain specific to gastric bypass (Table 1), but one must of course be alert to other unrelated disease processes, such as appendicitis, mesenteric ischemia, and other “non-bariatric” entities.

Table 1 Causes of abdominal pain after gastric bypass Go to:

Behavioral and nutritional disorders

Maladaptive eating behavior is a common cause of abdominal pain in the early post-operative period. Gastric bypass alters satiety and patients may not perceive fullness until pouch distension to the point of pain. Such pain is typically epigastric and postprandial, and a careful dietary history usually reveals a correlation with rapid eating. Modifying behavior to eat slowly and use defined portion sizes provides relief. Such problems rarely persist beyond six months after surgery, after which most patients have learned appropriate eating behaviors.

Specific foods may be prone to transient impaction and cause pain. This is most common within six months of surgery and the frequency of such intolerances may increase with banded gastric bypass (6). Such food intolerances are highly individualistic, making it difficult to generalize regarding specific foods. Nonetheless, hygroscopic foods such as rice, pasta, and bread, or fibrous foods such as meats and some vegetables and fruits, are common culprits and should be eaten in small quantities or avoided altogether. Other considerations should include gluten allergies, lactose intolerance, and other similar “non-bariatric” nutritional causes of pain. Finally, iron and B-12 deficiencies have been implicated as causes of abdominal pain although mechanisms of action are unknown (7). These observations underscore the importance of a thorough dietary history and diagnostic laboratory evaluation to identify food allergies and micronutrient deficiencies.

Bacterial overgrowth in the defunctionalized stomach or small intestine may cause abdominal pain and other non-specific gastrointestinal symptoms (8). Recent studies implicate intestinal bacterial overgrowth after gastric bypass with increased inflammation (9). Furthermore, manipulation of gut flora with probiotics improved weight loss after gastric bypass in a single study (10). These data aside, however, the mechanisms linking gut flora to clinical disease are poorly understood and a causal relationship between bacterial overgrowth and clinically significant gastrointestinal pathology after gastric bypass remains uncertain (11). Bacterial overgrowth is therefore in many cases a diagnosis of exclusion and treatment is often empiric. Nonetheless, hydrogen breath tests have been employed for diagnosis and empiric antibiotic therapy improves symptoms in anecdotal reports (12). Empiric surgical resection of defunctionalized components of the gastrointestinal tract at risk for overgrowth, most commonly the remnant stomach or the anti-peristaltic (“candy-cane”) segment of the Roux limb adjacent to the gastrojejunostomy (13), has been suggested. In the absence of clear pathology within the putative pathogenic segment (i.e. dilation, distal obstruction, fistula, ulceration, gastritis), however, the benefits of such interventions are unproven.

Go to:

Functional disorders

Functional gastrointestinal motility disorders may cause abdominal pain after gastric bypass. Obesity is an independent risk factor for multiple motility and other functional disorders of the gastrointestinal tract (14, 15) and surgery may exacerbate pre-existing subclinical disease. Such problems are likely more common than realized, often represent diagnoses of exclusion, and are particularly difficult to manage, as disease pathogenesis and diagnostic and treatment algorithms are poorly defined.

Constipation is common in the early post-operative period and may be associated with abdominal pain that is typically localized to the lower abdomen and diffuse and crampy in nature. Constipation may result from dehydration in the early post-operative period, and laxatives and increased water intake provide simple solutions. Gastric bypass less commonly causes diarrhea and/or increased flatus, which may be associated with abdominal pain (16). These symptoms are likely the result of mild malabsorption and loss of the remnant stomach as a storage depot for swallowed air. Judicious use of fiber supplements and anti-diarrheal medication may alleviate diarrhea, while simethicone-based medications may provide relief from excessive flatus. These problems, like constipation, usually improve with time.

More complex functional disorders are not as easily treated. Obesity is a risk factor for irritable bowel syndrome (17). Patients with chronic constipation or a history of irritable bowel syndrome should be warned that these symptoms may worsen after gastric bypass, although virtually no data exists documenting the longitudinal effects of gastric bypass on irritable bowel syndrome.

Esophageal motility disorders are also increased in prevalence in obesity (15, 18) and may cause of pain after gastric bypass that is typically substernal in location. Esophageal manometry aids in diagnosis, although findings are often non-specific. Of interest, many obese subjects demonstrate high amplitude peristaltic contractions, suggesting a nutcracker esophagus-like syndrome (18), a condition typically associated with pain. Dysphagia may be present as well. Generally, exacerbation of esophageal motility disorders is thought to be more common after gastric banding, which presents a fixed outlet obstruction to the esophagus, unlike gastric bypass, in which tissues distal to the esophagus are relatively more distensible (19). Banded gastric bypass may present similar problems, although dysphagia is more commonly reported than pain (6). As with irritable bowel syndrome, patients with esophageal motility disorders should be carefully counseled regarding possible exacerbation after bariatric surgery. Given the poorly understood pathogenesis of disease and the limited efficacy of surgical therapy for such disorders, we prefer conservative management, including dietary modification and calcium channel blockers if indicated by manometry.

Dumping syndrome is characterized by diverse symptoms including postprandial nausea, dizziness, flushing, and tachycardia. Pain is generally not a dominant symptom, but may be associated with bloating, cramping, and diarrhea that accompany dumping episodes. Symptoms are often precipitated by foods high in refined sugar, but may be caused by other foods as well. The pathogenesis of dumping syndrome is not fully understood and a complete discussion is beyond the scope of this review. Nonetheless, recent data suggest that dumping may be associated with elevated circulating levels of GLP-1 and other gut hormones (20). Other reports implicate an exaggerated post-prandial insulin response and hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia, possibly due to islet hyperplasia (21), although this latter entity remains rare and poorly understood. Most cases of dumping syndrome are mild and respond to dietary modification (22). Calcium channel antagonists or acarbose may provide relief (23, 24). Debilitating dumping syndrome refractory to conservative management is rare. Revisional surgery has been proposed in such cases, including procedures directed towards delaying pouch emptying and restoring food restriction, such as pouch reduction and anastomotic revision with or without placement of a perianastomic ring or band (25). Endoscopic plication of the gastrojejeunal anastomosis has been also been studied, but efficacy has not yet been clearly demonstrated (26). Partial pancreatectomy for hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia has been used as a treatment of last resort, with variable efficacy (25).

Go to:

Biliary disease

Biliary colic is a well-known cause of abdominal pain after gastric bypass. The extreme weight loss after bariatric surgery may contribute to increased bile lithogenicity and is a widely accepted risk factor for cholelithiasis. While the prevalence of cholelithiasis after bariatric surgery may exceed 40% in some series (27-30), the addition of ursodiol prophylaxis in the modern era reduces these prevalence rates to less than 3% (27, 31). The role of concomitant prophylactic cholecystectomy during gastric bypass therefore continues to be debated. Most surgeons do not perform prophylactic cholecystectomy, although as many as 30% do (32). While proponents argue that cholecystectomy is safe (30, 33), most data demonstrate it to be unnecessary from risk-benefit and cost perspectives (29, 34, 35). We believe that cholecystectomy is indicated in bariatric surgery patients only in the context of symptomatic cholelithiasis, just as in non-bariatric patients. In support of this approach, most studies demonstrate a low incidence of progression of cholelithiasis to clinical disease (28). Furthermore, just as in other patients, biliary colic is a herald symptom in the majority of patients after gastric bypass. In addition, surgically induced weight loss likely improves the safety of delayed cholecystectomy if it becomes necessary. Finally, the advent of ursodiol further supports expectant management. Six months of post-operative ursoidol therapy is a commonly used regimen supported by a multi-society consensus statement (36).

Choledocholithiasis and its sequelae, including cholangitis and gallstone pancreatitis, are uncommon causes of abdominal pain after gastric bypass. The availability of specialist expertise determines the preferred therapeutic intervention, and Roux limb anatomy has led to the development of a variety of approaches to access the biliary tree. These include laparoscopic common bile duct exploration, percutaneous transhepatic common bile duct instrumentation, per-oral endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) using specialized endoscopes, percutaneous or laparoscopic transgastric ERCP, and transenteric ERCP (37-39). Once access is achieved, stone extraction and other procedures are performed. Such techniques, while effective, require significant expertise, leaving laparoscopic or open common bile duct exploration as the most reasonable strategy for patients requiring acute intervention.

Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction is a rare cause of abdominal pain after gastric bypass. Secretin stimulated magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography is used for diagnosis, and surgical transduodenal pancreatic sphincteroplasty is appropriate therapy (40).

Pouch-related disease

A number of problems can affect the gastric pouch after gastric bypass and cause abdominal pain, include ulcer disease, fistula, reflux disease and stenosis.

 

Ulcer disease

Ulcer disease within the gastric pouch or at the gastrojejunal anastomosis may arise at any point after gastric bypass and occurs in 2-15% of patients (41, 42). Gastrogastric fistula, retained pouch parietal cells, and excessive tension on the anastomosis have been implicated as causes. Gastrogastric fistula was more common in the era of undivided gastric bypass, with reported rates of up to 50% (43,44). The advent of linear cutting staplers led to universal adoption of divided gastric bypass which greatly reduced the incidence of fistula to current rates of 0-6% (45, 46). Gastrogastric fistulae in the modern era are often the result of a pouch that is incompletely divided from the remnant stomach at initial operation. Gastrogastric fistula causes ulcer disease due to acid from the remnant stomach traversing the fistula into the gastric pouch. Upper gastrointestinal series is the diagnostic study of choice. Visualization of small fistulae by endoscopy may be difficult, and therefore represents a secondary diagnostic test. Fistulae are more often small and a cause of ulcer disease rather than large and a cause of weight regain, and may go unrecognized for long periods in patients with refractory ulcer disease. Recent studies of endoscopic fibrin glue injection demonstrate promise, but surgical revision is usually required (43).

Pouch anatomy has evolved over the past decades. Early gastric pouches were horizontal and fundus-based, allowing for use of the pliable tissues of the fundus to create the anastomosis. The increased compliance of the fundus led to pouches that were large and poorly motile, impairing emptying and contributing to poor weight loss. This led to a transition to “lesser curve-based” pouches, introduced in the early 1980s, in which a long, narrow pouch is created along the lesser curve of the stomach (47). This change in pouch morphology reduced pouch dilation, but led to an increase in anastomotic ulcer disease due to an increase in parietal cells located on the distal lesser curvature that are retained in the gastric pouch. (48). Creation of even smaller, “shorter” (in the cephalad-caudad direction) lesser curve based pouches thus may reduce ulcer disease by eliminating retained pouch parietal cells along the lesser curve (49, 50).

Ulcer disease may occur at any time after gastric bypass, and rarely presents with perforation (51). Pain is the most common presenting symptom, which is generally epigastric, burning in nature, and often immediately post-prandial secondary to passing food irritating the ulcer. Upper endosocopy provides a definitive diagnosis. Ulcer disease usually responds to medical therapy (41). Persistent ulcer disease in the absence of gastrogastric fistula that is non-responsive to medical therapy may be the result of excessive chronic tension on the anastomosis, or a large retained pouch parietal cell mass. Revisional surgery may be necessary in such cases, and consists of resection of the distal ulcerated pouch and revision of the gastrojejunal anastomosis. Lengthening maneuvers may be applied to the Roux limb to reduce tension as necessary, such as lengthening the mesenteric split or conversion to a retrocolic position. Such revisional operations are associated with significant morbidity and should be performed by surgeons with appropriate expertise (52).

Less common causes of ulcer disease include NSAID use, H. pylori infection, and foreign material such as staples or suture. While most clinicians recommend preoperative screening and treatment for H. pylori infection (53, 54), the efficacy of this practice in reducing clinical ulcer disease and its complications is questionable (53, 55). The use of non-absorbable sutures in creating gastrointestinal anastomosis is to be avoided, as this has been associated with an increased risk of anastomotic ulcer (56, 42). Finally, ulcer disease may also affect the remnant stomach or duodenum. Double balloon or shape lock enteroscopy has been used to study the duodenum and remnant stomach (57, 58). Such techniques are not widely performed, however, and medical treatment of suspected ulcer disease of the remnant stomach is therefore often empiric.

 

Gastroesophageal reflux disease and hiatus hernia

Obesity is an independent risk factor for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Fortunately, gastric bypass achieves remission of pre-existing GERD in over 85% of patients due to diversion of gastric contents from the gastroesophageal junction (59, 60). Persistent GERD after gastric bypass is generally not as severe as preexisting disease, and is most often attributable to either retained pouch parietal cells or fistula as discussed above. Bile reflux has also been implicated as a cause of GERD after gastric bypass (61). Hiatal hernia contributes to GERD in obese patients before and after gastric bypass. The prevalence of hiatus hernia is increased in obesity, and this anatomic defect may be under-recognized and under-treated during primary gastric bypass. As with primary GERD, medical therapy provides relief in the majority of patients. Elective repair of hiatal hernia has been shown to provide relief of abdominal pain and other GERD symptoms after gastric bypass in small series (62).

 

Stenosis

Anastomotic stenosis most often presents within three months of surgery with incidences ranging from 3-20%, most often between 5-10% (63, 64). Stenosis is characterized by dysphagia and is not a common cause of pain per se, but may accompany ulcer disease, anastomotic leak, or other pouch pathologies that are associated with pain. Isolated stenosis is rarely a cause of significant abdominal pain and if pain is a dominant symptom, other pathology should be sought. Stenosis appears to be more common after circular stapled gastrojenunal anastomosis (64). UGI series may be equivocal, and endoscopy is the diagnostic test of choice. Endoscopic balloon dilation provides effective therapy in most patients. Rare patients refractory to dilation may require surgical revision.

Small bowel-related disease

Small bowel-related complications that cause abdominal pain after gastric bypass include ventral and trocar site hernias, adhesive disease, internal hernias, and rarely, intussusception.

 

Incisional hernia, adhesions

While large ventral (incisional) hernias have been eliminated by laparoscopic bariatric surgery, trocar site hernias should always be considered in the patient with abdominal pain after gastric bypass. Trocar site hernias occur at an incidence of 0-1% after gastric bypass (65, 66), although this is likely an underreported entity. CT scan may be necessary to establish the diagnosis of a trocar site hernia in the patient with a thick subcutaneous abdominal wall fat pad. The Roux limb in an antecolic reconstruction lies directly under the abdominal wall and is particularly prone to incarceration in trocar hernias, and a Richter’s configuration may complicate diagnosis. Treatment is generally though a laparoscopic approach. For prevention, we utilize radially dilating trocars and have a low threshold for primary fascial closure of trocar sites.

Adhesive small bowel obstruction is uncommon in the era of laparoscopy, with an incidence of 0.2-1%, but should always be considered as a cause of abdominal pain after gastric bypass (67, 68). The jejunojeunostomy represents a common focus of adhesion formation. Adhesive small bowel obstruction after laparoscopic gastric bypass can often be managed with a laparoscopic approach.

 

Internal hernia

Internal hernia is an important cause of abdominal pain after gastric bypass with an incidence ranging from 1-9% (69-76). While risk factors are not well-defined, internal hernia is thought to occur most commonly within two to three years after primary gastric bypass, often in the context of significant weight loss. Other reports suggest that pregnancy may predispose to internal hernia, presumably secondary to alterations in intra-abdominal anatomy from the expanding uterus (77).

 

Types of internal hernia

The majority of Roux limbs in gastric bypass are positioned antecolic, while a minority are retrocolic, retrogastric, and even fewer are retrocolic, antegastric. These various anatomies are associated with different types of internal hernias (Figure 1). Virtually any segment of small intestine can incarcerate in any type of internal hernia, although the biliary limb is often involved, and longer biliary limb lengths may be associated with an increased risk of herniation (70). A mesenteric hernia is created by division of the jejunal mesentery at the jejunojenostomy and is present in all types of reconstruction. A Petersen’s hernia, in an antecolic reconstruction, is bounded by the Roux limb and its mesentery anteriorly/ventrally and the tranverse colon and its mesentery posteriorly/dorsally. In a retrocolic configuration, Petersen’s defect lies between the Roux limb and the colonic mesentery inferior (caudad) to the entry of the Roux limb through the mesocolic defect. A mesocolic hernia traverses the defect in the transverse colon mesentery in a retrocolic reconstruction. In series of retrocolic bypasses, mesocolic hernias comprise the majority of internal hernias (69, 74), for which reason antegastric reconstruction is believed to lead to fewer hernias overall and is the dominant approach (78). Finally, an uncommon site of internal herniation is between the limbs of jejunum distal to the end of the staple line and proximal to the distal stay suture used to create the side-to-side jejunojejunostomy (79). Prevention consists of ensuring that the staple line fully traverses the stay sutures.

Figure 1 Gastric bypass internal hernia anatomy

 

Routine closure of internal hernia defects

Much debate surrounds the issue of prophylactic closure of internal hernia defects at the time of primary gastric bypass. The efficacy of such closures is questionable: suture closure of mesenteric fat is tenuous and does not heal, but rather scars or adheses; laparoscopy is associated with fewer adhesions, which may predispose to failure of these closures. Furthermore, with weight loss, previously closed defects may open due to fat loss within the mesentery. While some advocate for routine closure (78), the literature as a whole does not clearly demonstrate a lower incidence of internal hernia with this practice. Series with no closure and others with routine closure report similar incidences ranging from 0.2-9% (72-76). Despite this debate, routine closure is straightforward and associated with low morbidity, and for these reasons, we advocate this practice.

 

Presentation, diagnosis, treatment of internal hernia

Internal hernia is typically associated with diffuse, episodic, severe abdominal pain which lasts hours and may or may not be postprandial. Pain may continue for months in those who do not seek treatment, but the risk of incarceration is always present. In the case of biliopancreatic limb obstruction, obstipation may not be present, further confusing diagnosis. CT signs of internal hernia have variable diagnostic predictive values, and signs of bowel obstruction may not be present until strangulation is imminent. The “mesenteric swirl sign” has a sensitivity ranging from 78%-100% and specificity 80-90% (80-82) (Figure 2). Other CT findings are less specific and demonstrate poor interobserver agreement. The high frequency of negative imaging may be due to the fact that scans may not be obtained during an episode of incarceration or that incarceration of a short segment of biliary limb may not cause recognizable small bowel dilation. For these reasons, severe abdominal pain in a patient with prior gastric bypass mandates surgical exploration unless a clear alternative diagnosis is established. While the specific technical aspects of surgical management of internal hernia are beyond the scope of this review, reduction of hernias and repair of defects with non-absorbable suture can usually be accomplished through a laparoscopic approa*****arceration, which in many cases is transient, may not be found at exploration, but closure of defects nonetheless achieves good results with relief of pain in the majority of patients. For example, Gandhi et al. studied over 700 gastric bypass patients over a five year period, 27 (3.8%) of whom developed post-operative small bowel obstruction. All of these patients had a preceding history of abdominal pain, bloating, and nausea. During the final year of the study, elective laparoscopic exploration with closure of defects was offered to 9 patients with similar symptoms, which were subsequently relieved in all patients (83). Agaba et al. studied 1500 patients of whom 75 were suspected of having internal hernia. Exploratory laparoscopy revealed internal hernia in 98% of those with diagnostic CT findings and in 69% of those with a non-diagnostic CT. Of note, laparoscopy revealed a treatable alternative diagnosis in all of the latter patients (84). Finally, in a series of 13 patients who underwent exploratory laparoscopy for pain after gastric bypass, 11 had a treatable cause of pain including internal hernia in four (85). These data support a low threshold for exploration for unexplained abdominal pain after gastric bypass.

Figure 2 Mesenteric swirl sign

 

Intussusception

Intussusception is a rare cause of abdominal pain after gastric bypass, occurring with an incidence of approximately 0.1% (86). Intussusception may occur months or years after gastric bypass and is associated with nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, and bowel obstruction (87). Like internal hernia, intussusception may be transient and chronic. Intussusception is often retrograde with the jejunojejunostomy acting as a lead point and progressing proximally along either the alimentary or biliopancreatic limb. Antegrade intussusception has also been reported (88). Altered migratory motor complexes due to ectopic myoelectric pacemakers in the Roux limb have been implicated as a possible cause (89). Plain abdominal films, gastrointestinal contrast studies, and abdominal ultrasound are unreliable diagnostic tools. CT scan may reveal a “target sign” or dilated excluded stomach, but these findings are relatively insensitive (90). A high level of clinical suspicion in the context of indications for operation, including obstruction or severe pain, should prompt exploration. Strangulation mandates resection. In the absence of strangulation, resection or reduction and plication are accepted approaches with most surgeons favoring the former (87).

 

Less common culprits

Stenosis of the jejeunojejunostomy may cause abdominal pain, and occurs with an incidence of approximately 0.5% (91). The use of longer (60mm) linear staplers may minimize this complication. While early jejeunojejunostomy stenosis may be due to edema and can often be managed expectantly (92), surgical anastomotic revision may be req

Ten years of witnessing and experiencing band failure is good research. The other surgeries available aren't without problems, as well. But banding is really dangerous, in my opinion. . I surely do have a personal hatred for the Lap-Band. I don't deny it for a second. It's hard to not hate something that almost killed me and caused my guts to be damaged permanently. I'm watching several friends going through similar things right now and it's refueled my dislike for the band. It's just insane, the amount of damage this contraption can cause. I wish the band performed as advertised, but it just doesn't. 

All I'm saying is that people NEED to know about the problems that occur with the band... and it's not safer to have multiple surgeries. With the band, you're signing up for multiple surgeries and a short term fix for a long term problem. My original point was that a person who has only had the band for a few years can't possibly speak to the "long term" success of it. Unless that person's life span is only a few years.