Lap band "open"
Has this happened to anyone here??
on 9/7/12 6:43 am - Wiesbaden, Germany
The question in my mind is the a defective lap band or was it defective surgery? If it was a defective band, then I would expect the manufacturer to pay. If it was the surgeon, shame it didn't happen during the global care period.
I hope your insurance will cover this.
on 9/7/12 12:00 am, edited 9/7/12 12:58 am
I think what your surgeon meant was that your band became "unbuckled", the newer bands can be unbuckled and "opened" if there is band slippage, the surgeon can just unbuckled the band and fix the dilated pouch instead of totally removing the band.
The older bands like I have 4cc 10ml band can't be unbuckled, but I honestly wonder if the newer bands are better -- I've seen more "issues" reported since 2007 when the newer bands came out than the older bands, I've been too tight, ate too much, many many stuck episodes, reflux, mild pouch dilation six years ago, and my band is still working perfectly at 7 years, but of course I still visit my surgeon when needed.
And yes, your surgeon will have to go back in surgically to fix it, I would personally ask for a new band, I would not trust that one.
Original Lap Band * 9/30/2005 * 4cc 10cm band*, lost 130 pounds. 7 Great years!
Revision surgery to AP small lap band *11/13/2012*, due to large hiatal hernia. I am hopeful about continuing my band journey uneventful and successful. I loved what my old band did for me and I am looking forward for my new band to Keep my weight down
There are just soooooooooo many things that can and DO go wrong with bands. You have already wasted a year on it. I would strongly advise that you revise to a different WLS.
I do agree with Nana on one point though. The new bands don't seem to be any better. Actually from what I've read, it was easier/quicker to reach restriction with the old 4cc bands.
Here's some info that may help:
https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfmaude/d etail.cfm?mdrfoi__id=1518243
Taper ii. Visual examination of the returned device determined the access port tubing connector to be a taper ii. The lab found the device functional, with only surgical damage. The band tubing (this is the portion of tubing located between the stainless steel connector and the band, not the stainless steel connector and the port) was broken with striations consistent with surgical damage and may have been made to facilitate removal of the device. Device labeling addresses the possible outcome of an unbuckled band as follows: "failure to secure the band properly may result in it subsequent displacement and necessitate re-operation. The lap-band ap system is not a lifetime product and it may break of fail in whole or in part at any time after implantation and notwithstanding the absence of any defect. ".
Avoid kemmerling, Green Bay, WI
My band nearly killed me, so my advice would be to get the sucker taken out. But I'm jaded by my experience.
Avoid kemmerling, Green Bay, WI