Considering the band? Think twice!
On March 9, 2011 at 5:10 PM Pacific Time, JoMixx wrote:
All I can say is I will take that 25% chance that I want it out. At least there is something that can be done. Rerouting your insides is just crazy...You are done and stuck with the results for the rest of your life. No second chances.
I think your unhappiness makes you appear to be a wackadoodle.
How do you figure bypass is not reversible? Why do you say it is for the rest of your life?
Previously Midwesterngirl
The band got me to goal, the sleeve will keep me there.
See my blog for newbies: http://wasabubblebutt.blogspot.com/
The band got me to goal, the sleeve will keep me there.
See my blog for newbies: http://wasabubblebutt.blogspot.com/
It amazes me what statistics you have chosen to put out there! Have you done all your research, or are you simply taking this article that has the information worded the way you want it.
Here are some other stats done on a report completed by the FDA. Of the 149 people followed only 4 had it removed and 1 had a revision in the first year following the procedure. In the second year NONE had it removed and only 4 had a revision. Yes, that came from the FDA!
Here are some other stats done on a report completed by the FDA. Of the 149 people followed only 4 had it removed and 1 had a revision in the first year following the procedure. In the second year NONE had it removed and only 4 had a revision. Yes, that came from the FDA!
Jenny S
On March 9, 2011 at 5:11 PM Pacific Time, jrspriggs wrote:
It amazes me what statistics you have chosen to put out there! Have you done all your research, or are you simply taking this article that has the information worded the way you want it. Here are some other stats done on a report completed by the FDA. Of the 149 people followed only 4 had it removed and 1 had a revision in the first year following the procedure. In the second year NONE had it removed and only 4 had a revision. Yes, that came from the FDA!
And? Where's your long term stats, lol?
You know what, I think you two are right. I am just gonna let it be, and not let it get to me. It does bother me when people do this kind of stuff. It absolutely annoys me, when stats are reported and you have no idea who was studied and what health issues they had prior and why the band was removed, most of the time it has nothing to do with the bad at all...
Okay, I am done!
Okay, I am done!
Jenny S
On March 9, 2011 at 5:15 PM Pacific Time, jrspriggs wrote:
You know what, I think you two are right. I am just gonna let it be, and not let it get to me. It does bother me when people do this kind of stuff. It absolutely annoys me, when stats are reported and you have no idea who was studied and what health issues they had prior and why the band was removed, most of the time it has nothing to do with the bad at all...Okay, I am done!
Excuse me? And what details did YOU give about the "facts" you stated???
On March 9, 2011 at 5:15 PM Pacific Time, jrspriggs wrote:
You know what, I think you two are right. I am just gonna let it be, and not let it get to me. It does bother me when people do this kind of stuff. It absolutely annoys me, when stats are reported and you have no idea who was studied and what health issues they had prior and why the band was removed, most of the time it has nothing to do with the bad at all...Okay, I am done!
Why don't you trot out that proof that 'most of the time' it's has nothing to do with the band? Or are you just throwing info out there hoping nobody will notice you just made it up?
Science proves you wrong on this one.
Previously Midwesterngirl
The band got me to goal, the sleeve will keep me there.
See my blog for newbies: http://wasabubblebutt.blogspot.com/
The band got me to goal, the sleeve will keep me there.
See my blog for newbies: http://wasabubblebutt.blogspot.com/
On March 9, 2011 at 5:30 PM Pacific Time, WASaBubbleButt wrote:
On March 9, 2011 at 5:15 PM Pacific Time, jrspriggs wrote:
You know what, I think you two are right. I am just gonna let it be, and not let it get to me. It does bother me when people do this kind of stuff. It absolutely annoys me, when stats are reported and you have no idea who was studied and what health issues they had prior and why the band was removed, most of the time it has nothing to do with the bad at all...Okay, I am done!
Why don't you trot out that proof that 'most of the time' it's has nothing to do with the band? Or are you just throwing info out there hoping nobody will notice you just made it up?
Science proves you wrong on this one.
LMAO!
Most Active
Recent Topics
OH - why aren't my posts being approved? Did I do something wrong?
FluffyPuff · 2 replies · 903 views
FluffyPuff · 2 replies · 903 views
OH2023 National Conference: Early Bird Tickets On Sale For A Limited Time! SAVE $30!
Member Services · 0 replies · 757 views
Member Services · 0 replies · 757 views
