Denial due to non compliance??? Really!!
I had the lap band placed in May 2006, everything went well and I lost about 90 lbs. I started to have pain at my port site and noticed I no longer had restriction so I went it have it checked out. After the EGD it was discovered I have erosion. All pre op requirements done according to fepblue, but denied due to non compliance. So after 2 submissions to the insurance company now my surgeon has a peer to peer scheduled for tomorrow 1/2/14. Praying everything goes well.
Anyone have this type of experience?
I am going through the same crap. I had my band placed in 2003 and only lost about 20 lbs.. I had fills and unfills and never could get it right. it was either everything went down with no obstruction or completely nothing for the first 3 years with the band. Then, Went through lots of IVF treatments and had 2 kids then nursed both so for 6 years I couldnt have a fill in my band anyway. Went to the original surgeon who placed the band. (HIS OFFICE LOST MY ENTIRE ORIGINAL FILE!) Last 2 years started trying again to see if I could get the right fills level. This time the band started causing loads of pain. Turns out trying to get it filled the last 2 years caused a severe slip and it i****ting my diaphragm. So, fought Cigna for the past year and they finally agreed to pay for band removal but will not pay for revision to sleeve due to non-compliance. So Cigna is saying that I meet all the other criteria but until I produce that now non-existant record, they will not pay for sleeve. How are we supposed to argue with that? To say we were not compliant is an opinion, not a fact. I would saying trying for years and years to avoid surgery again and work with a sleeve that isnt helping, is compliance.