does this sound "weird" or is it just me..

does 60 days sound reasonable http://news.kypost.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070808/NEWS02/708080355/1014 cuz I think she should have gotten longer..

I posted but it never showed , so I'll try again. What I said is that I agree with you. The woman has issues and should have been court ordered to get counseling, and she should have gotten more jail time. Makes you wonder what/how made the judge decide what he did. Weird.

the lawyers had settled on a plea deal but the judge refused it.. wanted her to do some time.. which I give him credit for.. "Bartlett previously rejected a plea deal that would have spared Dinkel, who pleaded guilty to third-degree rape, jail time. " and she is getting all this.. "Bartlett also ordered Dinkel to register as a sex offender for the next 20 years, receive psychological counseling, substance abuse treatment, pay a $2,500 fine, volunteer 200 hours of community service working with under-privileged women and earn no profit from books or movies about the case. " but I just thought if the sexes were reversed.. "he" would have gotten a longer term.. *I think*..

Darn it, I totally missed the part about the psychological counseling. And don't other sex offenders have to be registered FOREVER? Why does she only have to do it for 20 years? You're right, had it been a man it would have been a stiffer sentence (IMHO).

yeah... I thought this other news story weird too.. if they have a web site of pics showing a man having sexual relations with a toddler.. why give the wife a lighter (seperate crime) a sentence to testify against him.. http://news.kypost.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070809/NEWS01/708090357/1014/NEWS02