so no RNY failures?

amy p.
on 4/29/10 4:34 pm - smithsburg, MD
i was gung hoe about the band and im going to talk to a surgeon on may 5th about it... i thought it was safer, easier and much less recovery time,
but now all i hear about is how people have had so much wrong with it, and they go to the RNY???

im new to all this, and would like some input on it, now that my wheels in my head are turning, im going to weight all the options, please tell me how your rny has been and so forth!
thanks
Amy
    
on my way to my WLS journey and cannot wait!!!!
sweetforlife
on 4/30/10 3:47 am - Canada
Hi I am revising on Friday next week. Never really found that sweet spot, had heart burn, acid reflux, no real feeling of fullness. I had the band for three years and lost 50 lbs. First six months I lost nothing and was following the program.

May 7, 2010: Surgery!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! WOOOOOOOHOOOOOOOO
August 14, 2012: Panni+Fleur de lis!
"I can do all things through CHRIST who strengthens me"

        
Michelle Smith
on 4/30/10 10:58 am, edited 4/30/10 10:58 am
Hi Amy, I was initally going with the band, because thats all u see advertised, but after ALOT of research, I changed to VSG. I started @ 383, down to 288 4 months later, I am off my BP meds, & 1 of 2 COPD meds. This surgery has changed my life, & I liked the fact that there was no re routing of intestines, etc. I think every person is unique,& they choose the surgery that most fits them, & VSG was for me. This has nothing t o dowith RNY, I really just wanted to wish u well, & enjoy your new life!!!!!!!!

Whatever you decide, Best wishes!!!!

     
 
~~I am 5'8~~

                   

Ms. Cal Culator
on 5/1/10 11:33 am - Tuvalu
 Verboonen is a nice guy.  He was the first doctor to FINALLY diagnose that my band had caused esophageal dysmotility.   He took the saline out of my band so that I could revise to the DS.
Cynthia1968
on 4/30/10 12:27 pm - Waynesboro, PA
Hi Amy-
Five years ago, I started my journey to have bypass surgery.  I made it through most of my appointments, but then chickened out.  I was afraid of the malnutritrion, afraid of my hair falling out, and afraid of dying.

Fifty pounds later, I was so disgusted with myself I decided to try the WLS journey again, but this time opted for the banding route.  Because afterall, worse case scenario - it could be reversed.  It's very difficult - almost impossible - to reverse banding.

Every person's different - you have to do what's best for you.  But for me, this was the best decision.  It's not about how FAST you lose the weight, but how you can KEEP it off.

SLOW AND STEADY WINS THE RACE!!
Best of luck to you,
Cyndi


        
Ms. Cal Culator
on 5/1/10 11:28 am - Tuvalu
On April 30, 2010 at 7:27 PM Pacific Time, Cynthia1968 wrote:
Hi Amy-
Five years ago, I started my journey to have bypass surgery.  I made it through most of my appointments, but then chickened out.  I was afraid of the malnutritrion, afraid of my hair falling out, and afraid of dying.

Fifty pounds later, I was so disgusted with myself I decided to try the WLS journey again, but this time opted for the banding route.  Because afterall, worse case scenario - it could be reversed.  It's very difficult - almost impossible - to reverse banding.

Every person's different - you have to do what's best for you.  But for me, this was the best decision.  It's not about how FAST you lose the weight, but how you can KEEP it off.

SLOW AND STEADY WINS THE RACE!!
Best of luck to you,
Cyndi


It's malabsorption not malnutrition.

If you though it was malnutrition, no wonder you were afraid!  But, of course, a lot of people who profit from selling one kind of surgery don't seem to mind when people get bad information about the other surgeries...the ones they don't do.

Sue
Ms. Cal Culator
on 5/1/10 11:31 am - Tuvalu
 Wait...did you mean it's almost impossible to reverse the RnY?  Because it isn't impossible at all.  My surgeon revises RnYs to DS procedures on a routine basis.  

I feel bad that you were given so many incorrect "facts" about other procedures.
Ms. Cal Culator
on 5/1/10 11:25 am - Tuvalu
 A BMI of 46 seems to be the cut off point for determining the possibility of success (and that means losing HALF your excess weight) vs failure with a band.  Yes , of course, A FEW people with higher BMIs do better than average.  The amazing part is how many think they will be in "that few."


Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages 310-316 (May 2009)


View previous. 8 of 29 View next.

Failure of adjustable gastric banding: starting BMI of 46 kg/m2 is a fulcrum of success and failure

 

 

Brad Snyder, M.D., Terry Scarborough, M.D., Sherman Yu, M.D., Erik Wilson, M.D.

 

Received 13 May 2008; received in revised form 29 August 2008; accepted 22 September 2008. published online 08 October 2008.

Abstract 

Background

To determine the body mass index (BMI) located at the fulcrum of success and failure in a prospective study conducted at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. On average, our patients whose percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL) was >50% at 1 year had a significantly lower BMI than those with <30% EWL.

Methods

We prospectively collected the weight loss data for 430 patients who had had an adjustable gastric band placed. We stratified the %EWL within 1 year for patients with a BMI of 30–59 kg/m2. A line was generated for the %EWL over time for BMI groups of 30–39, 40–49, and 50–59 kg/m2 and compared with the average %EWL over time. The y-intercepts of the resulting four lines were graphed against the average BMI for each group.

Results

The generated y-intercept line had an R2 of .9237. Using the equation of this line and the known y-intercept for the average, we solved for x, resulting in a BMI of 46 kg/m2. Patients with a BMI <46 kg/m2 had a 50% EWL at 1 year, and those with a BMI >46 kg/m2 had only a 33% EWL at 1 year. The %EWL between the groups was significantly different at all measured intervals (P <.0001).

Conclusion

A BMI of 46 kg/m2 identifies those at high risk of failure to lose a significant percentage of excess weight after adjustable gastric banding and *****quire closer follow-up. Furthermore, patients who have a BMI >46 kg/m2 should be advised that their weight loss might be suboptimal at 1 year.


While you are researching, also visit dsfacts.com




Good luck to you.
(deactivated member)
on 5/2/10 12:13 pm
 Well I am 8 months post surgery and i love my RNY !!    I lost 112 lbs ....not that much hair , am Extremely healthy  ( i DID lose my diabetes and sleep apnea and my asthma got a lot better too) .  

Would I choose RNY again or recommend it to others ?   Yes if U dislike fatty foods ( like i did)  and have  a low BMI  ( mine was 35) . Otherwise it might not be enough of an intervention for U and U might have to live on a diet for the rest of Ur life .

The other altermative is the DS - which works better long term for larger people I think ....

The VSG seems to have  a great track record and it IS half a DS so if you find you need more U can always have the rest of the surgery .  I don't see anywhere near as much regain with the VSG  as with the RNY  or the band ,..... but they havent been doing it as long . 

I personally would NEVER get a band ....the port ,the high rate of complications, severe acid reflux  ulcers , the fact that its "merely " restrictive....also ive had friends who just didn't lose "enough " weight with the band and regretted their surgical choice for that reason  alone.  


wildwes2222
on 5/8/10 7:39 pm
you look amazing congrats on the huge weight loss. I have just started my jurney . but to see folks like you that have won the race is inspiring.
thanks for the photos and the coments
Most Active
×