Monday Mind Melting Mixer!
(deactivated member)
on 12/7/09 12:32 am, edited 12/7/09 2:38 am - Sweet Dreams lives in , PA
on 12/7/09 12:32 am, edited 12/7/09 2:38 am - Sweet Dreams lives in , PA
Hey Family! Thanks so much for the love.....feeling much better this week! I got my Wii and Wii Fitness and so far...I am so excited about it! Will break the Wii Fitness open tonight! The kids and I played with Wii Sport over the weekend and Wii like!
Now to my MMMM!
Okay...there's always going to be talk about relationships, xes and related issues. As much as I don't like a lot of the stuff that jumps off between the sexes....I still tend to think that the creator, mother nature, evolution or whatever kicked this off GOT IT RIGHT or perhaps we are dealing with the lesser of two evils! So I am not complaining!
Consider this:
Let's say that all else remained the same but the numbers were reversed....i.e. there were more men then women.
And then answer these questions (mine follow in pink):
1.) How do you think this scenario would impact the heterosexual and homosexual
relationships and explain!
2.) How do you think it would it impact our population and family structures!
3.) How would it impact social problems and the criminal justice system?
Feel free to add any other comments. LMAOooooo....see what dissolution of a relationship (still friends) will do to one's mind....have you thinking about some silly shioot!!! This is first time in my life that a man wants to get serious and I don't. I would be perfectly content with a FWB scenario or LTR with separate living arrangements...why complicate matters..... Does that mean...I am afraid of commitment? I don't think so ...I just don't want any drama at this stage of my life...back to abstinence ~sigh~....well that leads to part two of MMMM!
4.) What do you perceive as the main motivators (besides love) for middle aged divorced people
with children from previous relationships wanting to "live together" in a LTR or marriage
considering the state of affairs when it comes to men and women?
My Answers:
1.) How do you think this scenario would impact the heterosexual and homosexual
relationships and explain!
Well.....heterosexual relationship might actually prosper if both people are compatible. A
woman would be less likely to think with her "man in the boat" and risk losing her current
mate over some minute sensations! Plus...we would not want to jump off any domestic
issues because we would be more inclined to "think" about all ramifications. Men might be
more appeciative of their mates because they know there aren't many other options out
there FOR REAL...LOL! I know I am being prejudiced but I really don't think that women
would take advantage of the "grass is greener' or "his d!ck looks bigger" excuse if the shoe
was on the other foot. We tend to be more connected to the father of our children. Now if the
men were the ones to give birth...then maybe I might be able to see that point! Not saying its
right though. Just saying that when able to probe the real psyche of men...maybe
some shioot will come to light!
I think there would definitely be more acceptance of men/men homosexual
relationships....because being the so called dominate sex...they would still dictate to some
degree what socials norms are acceptable. I don't know....but there might be a heterosexual
man or two (less likely for bruthas) willing to experiment! This might impact our population
and regeneration as a species!
Female homosexual relationships might experience more heat from men...or might
have more men begging to be the in between (LOL!) person!
2.) How do you think it would it impact our population and family structures!
I think that there would be more social programs and incentives domesitc and internationally
for folks to have kids as oppose of abstaining! Our populations and existence as a species
might be at issue. A significant increase in homosexual nuclear families...not saying this
as a bad thing.
Heyl...they might actually go as far as to pass an international treaty on homosexual
marriage...let alone one in the state of Cali!
3.) How would it impact social problems and the criminal justice system?
Heyl....more than one war has been started because of some poo na na! The shiot would be
off and cracking if there was not enough poo na na to go around! All that testosterone
backed the fluck up...would start many a bar brawl, the word "No" would become the
most misunderstood word in the english dictionary, there would be boochoos money to be
made on chastity belts....especially those designed by Apple Bottoms, House of Dereon,
Baby Phat etc... etc... We still would want our shioot stylish and tight though!
4.) What do you perceive as the main motivators (besides love) for middle aged divorced people
with children from previous relationships wanting to "live together" in a LTR or marriage
considering the state of affairs when it comes to men and women?
For me....I precieve insecurity, finances and perhaps sex (sleeping in same bed together
every night) as the main motivators. When I personally weigh it out.....just does not
seem like a solution worth the possible ensuing drama of getting to know every little
idiosyncrasy of the person...with some bound to get on your last dayum nerves! of the other
person. I think I am going to focus on safely enjoying my single life. I just hate the double
standard though!
So in addition to AIDS, we would then have a social structure threatening our mere existence as human being! Even though its starting to look as if this shioot (the world as we know it) is about to end for real.....when you think about it...I guess....absinence due to men shortage, dating outside ones ethnicity, FWB is not something so horrible that others should judge! LMAOOOOoooooo! Okay....I am straight for the moment! Thanks for letting me vent in my own weird, I mean special, way!
ETA: Either ya'll scared, don't feel like melting your mind or you think I have completely lost it!
Place your bets!
Now to my MMMM!
Okay...there's always going to be talk about relationships, xes and related issues. As much as I don't like a lot of the stuff that jumps off between the sexes....I still tend to think that the creator, mother nature, evolution or whatever kicked this off GOT IT RIGHT or perhaps we are dealing with the lesser of two evils! So I am not complaining!
Consider this:
Let's say that all else remained the same but the numbers were reversed....i.e. there were more men then women.
And then answer these questions (mine follow in pink):
1.) How do you think this scenario would impact the heterosexual and homosexual
relationships and explain!
2.) How do you think it would it impact our population and family structures!
3.) How would it impact social problems and the criminal justice system?
Feel free to add any other comments. LMAOooooo....see what dissolution of a relationship (still friends) will do to one's mind....have you thinking about some silly shioot!!! This is first time in my life that a man wants to get serious and I don't. I would be perfectly content with a FWB scenario or LTR with separate living arrangements...why complicate matters..... Does that mean...I am afraid of commitment? I don't think so ...I just don't want any drama at this stage of my life...back to abstinence ~sigh~....well that leads to part two of MMMM!
4.) What do you perceive as the main motivators (besides love) for middle aged divorced people
with children from previous relationships wanting to "live together" in a LTR or marriage
considering the state of affairs when it comes to men and women?
My Answers:
1.) How do you think this scenario would impact the heterosexual and homosexual
relationships and explain!
Well.....heterosexual relationship might actually prosper if both people are compatible. A
woman would be less likely to think with her "man in the boat" and risk losing her current
mate over some minute sensations! Plus...we would not want to jump off any domestic
issues because we would be more inclined to "think" about all ramifications. Men might be
more appeciative of their mates because they know there aren't many other options out
there FOR REAL...LOL! I know I am being prejudiced but I really don't think that women
would take advantage of the "grass is greener' or "his d!ck looks bigger" excuse if the shoe
was on the other foot. We tend to be more connected to the father of our children. Now if the
men were the ones to give birth...then maybe I might be able to see that point! Not saying its
right though. Just saying that when able to probe the real psyche of men...maybe
some shioot will come to light!
I think there would definitely be more acceptance of men/men homosexual
relationships....because being the so called dominate sex...they would still dictate to some
degree what socials norms are acceptable. I don't know....but there might be a heterosexual
man or two (less likely for bruthas) willing to experiment! This might impact our population
and regeneration as a species!
Female homosexual relationships might experience more heat from men...or might
have more men begging to be the in between (LOL!) person!
2.) How do you think it would it impact our population and family structures!
I think that there would be more social programs and incentives domesitc and internationally
for folks to have kids as oppose of abstaining! Our populations and existence as a species
might be at issue. A significant increase in homosexual nuclear families...not saying this
as a bad thing.
Heyl...they might actually go as far as to pass an international treaty on homosexual
marriage...let alone one in the state of Cali!
3.) How would it impact social problems and the criminal justice system?
Heyl....more than one war has been started because of some poo na na! The shiot would be
off and cracking if there was not enough poo na na to go around! All that testosterone
backed the fluck up...would start many a bar brawl, the word "No" would become the
most misunderstood word in the english dictionary, there would be boochoos money to be
made on chastity belts....especially those designed by Apple Bottoms, House of Dereon,
Baby Phat etc... etc... We still would want our shioot stylish and tight though!
4.) What do you perceive as the main motivators (besides love) for middle aged divorced people
with children from previous relationships wanting to "live together" in a LTR or marriage
considering the state of affairs when it comes to men and women?
For me....I precieve insecurity, finances and perhaps sex (sleeping in same bed together
every night) as the main motivators. When I personally weigh it out.....just does not
seem like a solution worth the possible ensuing drama of getting to know every little
idiosyncrasy of the person...with some bound to get on your last dayum nerves! of the other
person. I think I am going to focus on safely enjoying my single life. I just hate the double
standard though!
So in addition to AIDS, we would then have a social structure threatening our mere existence as human being! Even though its starting to look as if this shioot (the world as we know it) is about to end for real.....when you think about it...I guess....absinence due to men shortage, dating outside ones ethnicity, FWB is not something so horrible that others should judge! LMAOOOOoooooo! Okay....I am straight for the moment! Thanks for letting me vent in my own weird, I mean special, way!
ETA: Either ya'll scared, don't feel like melting your mind or you think I have completely lost it!
Place your bets! (deactivated member)
on 12/7/09 3:09 am, edited 12/7/09 3:10 am
on 12/7/09 3:09 am, edited 12/7/09 3:10 am
Disclaimer: All of my answers are predicated on only the numbers being reversed between males and females and do not include the biological benefits therein.
1.) How do you think this scenario would impact the heterosexual and homosexual
relationships and explain!
On the heterosexual tip, men would still try to nail any tail that wagged. F'real doe.
On the homosexual tip, I think you'd still have that but to a larger degree it would be more open and less taboo in society the way it is now. A look at Greco-Roman history around the time of Plato and Aristotle will support what I'm saying here.
2.) How do you think it would it impact our population and family structures!
Personally, I think man-kind would quickly work to reduce those numbers (whether by accident or by design) because it is part of the male nature or psyche to exhibit the unwritten survival of the fittest rules in everything that we do.
3.) How would it impact social problems and the criminal justice system?
Violent crimes would indeed rise because men are warriors for the most part, so their ability to keep their hands to themselves would be impacted by the need to want to lash out or act out verses sitting down to discuss or rationalize with an individual. Plus you would see a rise in men trying to steal each others women. This would be more overt than it is done now because of the survival of the fittess rule - much like it was with the cavemen and it still is with the beast of the fields and jungles today.
1.) How do you think this scenario would impact the heterosexual and homosexual
relationships and explain!
On the heterosexual tip, men would still try to nail any tail that wagged. F'real doe.
On the homosexual tip, I think you'd still have that but to a larger degree it would be more open and less taboo in society the way it is now. A look at Greco-Roman history around the time of Plato and Aristotle will support what I'm saying here.
2.) How do you think it would it impact our population and family structures!
Personally, I think man-kind would quickly work to reduce those numbers (whether by accident or by design) because it is part of the male nature or psyche to exhibit the unwritten survival of the fittest rules in everything that we do.
3.) How would it impact social problems and the criminal justice system?
Violent crimes would indeed rise because men are warriors for the most part, so their ability to keep their hands to themselves would be impacted by the need to want to lash out or act out verses sitting down to discuss or rationalize with an individual. Plus you would see a rise in men trying to steal each others women. This would be more overt than it is done now because of the survival of the fittess rule - much like it was with the cavemen and it still is with the beast of the fields and jungles today.
(deactivated member)
on 12/7/09 3:53 am, edited 12/7/09 3:53 am - Sweet Dreams lives in , PA
on 12/7/09 3:53 am, edited 12/7/09 3:53 am - Sweet Dreams lives in , PA
Thanks for playing along Aye!!!
@ On the heterosexual tip, men would still try to nail any tail that wagged. F'real doe.
I know you was talking about human tail
.......but dayum....if you did not just bring up another scenario. I mean we know that even now *******ity is not something out of the realm of human consideration.....I can definitely see those number increasing as well....not to mention STDs of a whole new strain! Folks be talking about finding a cure for Monkey Herpes 
and Horsorrhea 
!!! GTFO....we are doing aright. Count the blessings.
On the homosexual tip, I think you'd still have that but to a larger degree it would be more open and less taboo in society the way it is now. A look at Greco-Roman history around the time of Plato and Aristotle will support what I'm saying here
Yep...I totally agree...but then again...that brings a whole new dynamic.... Especially when we consider that a lot of those homosexual tendencies involved young boys. I don't even want to think about how this will impact some heads of religious organizations who "chose to break their vows". Have the few young men...all screwed up in the head!
See....the more I talk this out....I am thinking....there's hope for the state of our current affairs.
2.) How do you think it would it impact our population and family structures!
Personally, I think man-kind would quickly work to reduce those numbers (whether by accident or by design) because it is part of the male nature or psyche to exhibit the unwritten survival of the fittest rules in everything that we do.
Could you explain further....who would be killing whom? or...am I not understanding?
3.) How would it impact social problems and the criminal justice system?
Violent crimes would indeed rise because men are warriors for the most part, so their ability to keep their hands to themselves would be impacted by the need to want to lash out or act out verses sitting down to discuss or rationalize with an individual. Plus you would see a rise in men trying to steal each others women. This would be more overt than it is done now because of the survival of the fitness rule - much like it was with the cavemen and it still is with the beast of the fields and jungles today.
@ you say much "like" it was with the cavemen....Heyl... the cavemen would reinvent himself.....instead of bashing each other in the head with clubs.....they would be running over each other with their old Cadillacs and then trading them in for new....talkin bout how the nicca messed up his rims with all that dayum blood ....the shiot would be ruthless..... folks think we are dealing with some stuff now......WOW!!!! Thank God....we are just hypothesizing.
@ On the heterosexual tip, men would still try to nail any tail that wagged. F'real doe.I know you was talking about human tail
.......but dayum....if you did not just bring up another scenario. I mean we know that even now *******ity is not something out of the realm of human consideration.....I can definitely see those number increasing as well....not to mention STDs of a whole new strain! Folks be talking about finding a cure for Monkey Herpes and Horsorrhea !!! GTFO....we are doing aright. Count the blessings. On the homosexual tip, I think you'd still have that but to a larger degree it would be more open and less taboo in society the way it is now. A look at Greco-Roman history around the time of Plato and Aristotle will support what I'm saying here
Yep...I totally agree...but then again...that brings a whole new dynamic.... Especially when we consider that a lot of those homosexual tendencies involved young boys. I don't even want to think about how this will impact some heads of religious organizations who "chose to break their vows". Have the few young men...all screwed up in the head!
See....the more I talk this out....I am thinking....there's hope for the state of our current affairs.
2.) How do you think it would it impact our population and family structures!
Personally, I think man-kind would quickly work to reduce those numbers (whether by accident or by design) because it is part of the male nature or psyche to exhibit the unwritten survival of the fittest rules in everything that we do.
Could you explain further....who would be killing whom? or...am I not understanding?
3.) How would it impact social problems and the criminal justice system?
Violent crimes would indeed rise because men are warriors for the most part, so their ability to keep their hands to themselves would be impacted by the need to want to lash out or act out verses sitting down to discuss or rationalize with an individual. Plus you would see a rise in men trying to steal each others women. This would be more overt than it is done now because of the survival of the fitness rule - much like it was with the cavemen and it still is with the beast of the fields and jungles today.
@ you say much "like" it was with the cavemen....Heyl... the cavemen would reinvent himself.....instead of bashing each other in the head with clubs.....they would be running over each other with their old Cadillacs and then trading them in for new....talkin bout how the nicca messed up his rims with all that dayum blood ....the shiot would be ruthless..... folks think we are dealing with some stuff now......WOW!!!! Thank God....we are just hypothesizing. (deactivated member)
on 12/7/09 5:44 am
on 12/7/09 5:44 am
Folks be talking about finding a cure for Monkey Herpes and Horsorrhea...
Monkey Herpes?!
and BAF thinks that I've lost it. Too funny.
Especially when we consider that a lot of those homosexual tendencies involved young boys.
And why did they use young boys? Because those young boys were far weaker than their male antagonizers. Back then, like in prisons all across America now, it was mostly about power not necessarily about attractiveness.
I don't even want to think about how this will impact some heads of religious organizations who "chose to break their vows". Have the few young men...all screwed up in the head!
True. Much like today.
See....the more I talk this out....I am thinking....there's hope for the state of our current affairs.
Perhaps. But I need to see more data on the subject first.
2.) How do you think it would it impact our population and family structures!
Could you explain further....who would be killing whom? or...am I not understanding?
Accident - Wars, famine, disease, pestilence...
Design - Wars, Arms stockpiles, mob mentality to pillage and destroy...
3.) How would it impact social problems and the criminal justice system?
@ you say much "like" it was with the cavemen....Heyl... the cavemen would reinvent himself.....instead of bashing each other in the head with clubs.....they would be running over each other with their old Cadillacs and then trading them in for new....talkin bout how the nicca messed up his rims with all that dayum blood ....the shiot would be ruthless..... folks think we are dealing with some stuff now......WOW!!!! Thank God....we are just hypothesizing.
Exactly. Look at the drug-game here in America for an example. Dealers fight over turf to acquire more real estate in order to sell more drugs - but do what ultimately? Answer: To buy more gawdy and useles trinkets like jewelry and rims. Some people sell drugs out of necessity but in most cases it just comes down to braggin rights - another form of that caveman mentality that we discussed earlier.
Monkey Herpes?!
and BAF thinks that I've lost it. Too funny. Especially when we consider that a lot of those homosexual tendencies involved young boys.
And why did they use young boys? Because those young boys were far weaker than their male antagonizers. Back then, like in prisons all across America now, it was mostly about power not necessarily about attractiveness.
I don't even want to think about how this will impact some heads of religious organizations who "chose to break their vows". Have the few young men...all screwed up in the head!
True. Much like today.
See....the more I talk this out....I am thinking....there's hope for the state of our current affairs.
Perhaps. But I need to see more data on the subject first.
2.) How do you think it would it impact our population and family structures!
Could you explain further....who would be killing whom? or...am I not understanding?
Accident - Wars, famine, disease, pestilence...
Design - Wars, Arms stockpiles, mob mentality to pillage and destroy...
3.) How would it impact social problems and the criminal justice system?
@ you say much "like" it was with the cavemen....Heyl... the cavemen would reinvent himself.....instead of bashing each other in the head with clubs.....they would be running over each other with their old Cadillacs and then trading them in for new....talkin bout how the nicca messed up his rims with all that dayum blood ....the shiot would be ruthless..... folks think we are dealing with some stuff now......WOW!!!! Thank God....we are just hypothesizing.Exactly. Look at the drug-game here in America for an example. Dealers fight over turf to acquire more real estate in order to sell more drugs - but do what ultimately? Answer: To buy more gawdy and useles trinkets like jewelry and rims. Some people sell drugs out of necessity but in most cases it just comes down to braggin rights - another form of that caveman mentality that we discussed earlier.
@ 
. I must have slept on that one! 
Most Active
Recent Topics
