Blackdynasty....We Are Glad You are Back But........

Just Valena
on 5/23/08 1:39 am - Nunyabizness
Ah. Well OK, in that sense, I totally see where you are coming from! I didn't view it from THAT perspective.

        

               




 

LuciousLA & Babylapband
on 5/23/08 1:26 am - Greenbelt, MD
Lap Band on 02/13/06 with
I know you said Kim but may I? I think the difference is that a "link" was place sending folks to the profile but the picture was left intact on the profile, where this time, the picture was copied into a post. On my profile, I have control of my pictures, I may want to have it open to the public one day and close, I may decide to delete a picture off my profile however, on someone else post...I cant delete that picture if I wanted to. I have no control.  just my thoughts.
Just Valena
on 5/23/08 1:40 am - Nunyabizness
Point taken...although I have will say I find it hard to believe that the same response would not have been generated on this post if there would have been a 'link only.'

        

               




 

(deactivated member)
on 5/23/08 1:26 am
The difference was that they weren't part of the family..LMAOOOOOOOOOOOOO
LuciousLA & Babylapband
on 5/23/08 1:39 am - Greenbelt, MD
Lap Band on 02/13/06 with
Just Valena
on 5/23/08 1:43 am - Nunyabizness
Alright Miss Filet-O-Fish...

        

               




 

(deactivated member)
on 5/23/08 7:12 am - Georgia Peach, MD
Lena, I think you are referring to a post that I put up with the link to the lady's profile with the skin. The point I was trying to make is for us to be grateful and love ourselves (skin and all) because it could be worse (the reason for the link).  I did this AFTER several women on BAF had been complaining about their excess skin.  It was in no way meant to belittle the lady. Never did I say "Thank God I don't look like this" or nothing similar. 
(deactivated member)
on 5/23/08 1:21 am - Dallas, TX
Kim,   Thank you, I understand what you are saying.  Thins goes much deeper than just pics on a profile(That can be blocked). I am concerned for "The Woman". I was hoping that someone would let her know to come if she could. I would even speak to her one on one. Again this was sent IN LOVE for my sister........unlike a lot of posts on BAF which are made to embarass someone.
Rochelle
on 5/23/08 1:29 am - Farmington Hills, MI
Rev,  I believe that you believe that this was "in love"  however there is this little thing called perception and that's not how I got it and many others as you can see.  My first and second reaction was DANG!!!  and why pop the pic in???  It just intensified the negativity already surrounding the situation.

I'm every women . . .                      


misha
on 5/23/08 1:34 am - peoria, IL
And if this was done in love, and it was not done to embarass....then why wasn't the post in the original thread enough?   Why was a new thread started with this post?  For ATTENTION.  Not love, and not about being truthful. Read the bible and see how many times did Jesus use this tactic and call it love.  The woman at the well, the woman about to be stoned for adultery, the list goes on.  I really hope that this is not the way you conduct your ministry.
Most Active
Recent Topics
Is this group still active?
CocoButterfly · 4 replies · 308 views
Please help
revemclane1028 · 4 replies · 1246 views
CANDY CANE SYNDROME
christy2544 · 5 replies · 2689 views
×