"New Obesity Definition Challenges Current Use of B.M.I."

Batwingsman
on 1/27/25 9:07 pm - Garland, TX

This news appears interesting, although note that you have to have subscription to the online New York Times to view the entire article:

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/01/14/health/bmi-obesity-defini tion.html?campaign_id=190&emc=edit_ufn_20250127&instance_id= 145851&nl=from-the-times®i_id=117004983&segment_id=189376 &user_id=d7d4ce73920c6065ee2272a6a9621b2c

If anyone on here has such a subscription, can you please cut and paste the article here, or possibly a link to some other source of the info. online that does not require a subscription?

Frank talk about the DS / "All I ever wanted to be was thin, like that Rolling Stones dude ... "

HW/461 LW/251 GW/189 CW/274 (yep, a DS semi-failure - it happens :-( )

Batwingsman
on 1/28/25 12:46 pm - Garland, TX

Ah, here we go:

https://apnews.com/article/obesity-bmi-weight-definition-lan cet-f3aafc072a3e685036d32ce3d9c3adac#qs1v13h8ynm8fd0gtncut7u kyx2mv2v4a

Just call me "cynical", but I have to wonder if there are not some "$$ to be made" behind this "push", by some "interested" group(s), e.g. health care practitioners, pharm. cos., weight loss product manufs., ins. cos., etc.

Frank talk about the DS / "All I ever wanted to be was thin, like that Rolling Stones dude ... "

HW/461 LW/251 GW/189 CW/274 (yep, a DS semi-failure - it happens :-( )

×