Thoughts on frozen, but cooked meat from companies like Tyson?

Sparklekitty, Science-Loving Derby Hag
on 4/27/18 7:53 am
RNY on 08/05/19

If the raw chicken is 130 cal/4oz, it's 32.5 cal/oz.

For the frozen stuff, it's 90 cal/3oz, which is 30 cal/oz.

Seems close enough for me :)

Sparklekitty / Julie / Nerdy Little Secret (#42)
Roller derby - cycling - triathlon
VSG 2013, RNY conversion 2019 due to GERD. Trendweight here!

Liz WantsHealthForAll
on 4/28/18 4:58 am - Cape Cod, MA
VSG on 03/28/16

I'm going to try these. Sounds like a handy thing to have in the freezer!

Liz 5'3" HW: 219 SW: 185 GW: 125 LW: 113 Desired maintenance range: 120-125 CW: 121

NYMom222
on 4/28/18 8:22 pm
RNY on 07/23/14

If you do the math

4cal per gram for protein x 21 = 84

4cal per gram for carbs x 1 = 4

9 cal per gram for fat x .5 = 4.5

so just by math it comes to 92.5. So 90 sounds right.

Cynthia 5'11" RNY 7/23/2014

Goal reached 17 months. 220lb Weight Loss
Plastic Surgery Dr. Joseph Michaels - LBL and Hernia Repair 2/29/16, Arm Lift, BL, 5/2/16, Leg Lift 7/25/16

#lifeisanadventure #fightthegoodfight #noregrets

Save

Save

Sharon SW-267
GW-165 CW-167 S.

on 4/29/18 6:13 am, edited 4/28/18 11:19 pm - PA
RNY on 12/22/14

As a math teacher, let me address the prot/cal issue - ie can the label be accurate?

Protein and carbohydrates both contain 4 calories per gram, while fat provides 9 calories per gram.

So, based on the label - 84 gm serving

fat: 9 *0.5=4.5 carb: 4*1=4 prot:21*4=84

Add them up: 4.5+4+84=95 cal (5 cal is rounding error). So that is possibly accurate, but wait a minute, what about the total weight - those total 84 grams (equivalent of a 3 oz serving - about 28 gms/ounce.)

Out of the 84 grams (real food=fat(0.5)+carb(1gm)+prot(21g)=that is 23gms of macro nutrients in a 84gm serving. So, what the heck is the other 61 gms made from?? 84-23=61 gms. Probably a lot of water, some preservatives, sodium and "natural flavorings).

I'm not knocking these products - I have some in my freezer (and a few cans of tunafish in the cupboard for when I didnot get to the store). But, you raise a good question when 75% of the portion is neither fat, carb nor prot, what are you really eating.Good Housekeeping has a good write up on raw chicken - a little more fat (maybe Tyson cooks the fat off) and a little less carb (1gm of seasonings etc sounds about right - a gm is 1/28 of an ounce.)

https://www.goodhousekeeping.com/health/diet-nutrition/a4805 4/chicken-breast-nutrition/

I'm not knocking these products - I have some in my freezer (and a few cans of tunafish in the cupboard for when I didnot get to the store). But, you raise a good question when 75% of the portion is neither fat, carb nor prot, what are you really eating.

Sharon

Valerie G.
on 5/2/18 1:41 pm - Northwest Mountains, GA

It doesn't take much longer to cook a natural piece of chicken than to subject yourself to such a chemical ****storm. You're not saving much time at all and the cost is much higher if you compare.

Valerie
DS 2005

There is room on this earth for all of God's creatures..
next to the mashed potatoes

RNY on 12/22/14

My thoughts exactly. When I cook up a few pounds of chicken breast, I am surprised at how much it ends up being.

Sharon

×