So Conflicted - Advice Needed
I highly suggest going with the VSG. It is a much less invasive surgery, with fewer risks and at 5 years has the same results as the RNY. Plus, if you are truly worried about not loosing enough weight or regain, you can later add the DS portion to your VSG. My hospital doesn't even off RNY to people without Barrett's esophagus.
on 4/1/17 8:18 am
FWIW, I'm 7 months out after VSG. I'm 5'3", 55 years old and weighed 271.5 on the day I met with my surgeon. I had to do a 3 month supervised weight loss and was 246.9 at surgery. I'm 188 now - down 83 pounds.
All my labs have come back good and my bones are good. I think that if you put your head in the right place you will lose weight with either.
Best of luck.
Keep on losing!
Diana
HW 271.5 (April 2016) SW 246.9 (8/23/16) CW 158 (5/2/18)
I grilled my surgeon about his complication rates prior to having surgery. He hadn't had a "major"complication for years prior to my surgery. From my understanding, he hasn't had many since either.
WLS is an awesome tool to reach a goal weight, but even the "simple" surgeries should be performed by only the best and experienced surgeons.
Scott
on 4/1/17 4:05 pm
I agree that if you had your mind set on RNY, that's what you should go for. There are pros and cons to each one. Both are major surgery. However if you have the sleeve and then you don't end up losing what you want, will you always wonder why you didn't have the bypass? I went back and forth between them and ultimately chose the sleeve. I've been happy with my decision but I know it's 'just a tool'. As others have said, both require a commitment to change in eating habits to be successful in the long term. That's the naked truth we all have to wrap our heads around after surgery, no matter which one you choose.