OT: Raise your hand for PLANNED PARENTHOOD
i am personally opposed to abortion. hence, i never had one nor considered one. but i have had friends and family who did choose to terminate pregnancies for their own, specific, personal reasons, and i'll be damned if i will ever stand in the way of anyone who feels it is the right choice FOR THEM. it is a private decision between a woman, her doctor, and her chosen deity.... everyone else needs to butt the hell out...
okay, off my soapbox now....
jeris
Part of it is a bit of racism too.... some people look at the stats that show that well-educated, middle-class white folks tend to have fewer babies than poorly educated lower-class non-white folks, and they have this whole fear of being outnumbered, so they want the baby-making to commence with fervor.
That's my take on it.
~Lady Lithia~ 200 lbs lost!
March 9, 2011 - Coccygectomy!
I chased my dreams, and my dreams, they caught me!
Thanks so much for the education!!! I'm not real familiar with Planned Parenthood as, fortunately, I've never needed them, so thank you for bringing me up to speed on this.
Are the abortions actually federally funded, or is this just political rhetoric?
Again, thanks so much for taking the time to explain this to me!!
DEB
The Hyde Amendment
After Roe v. Wade decriminalized abortion in 1973, Medicaid covered abortion care without restriction. In 1976, Representative Henry Hyde (R-IL) introduced an amendment that later passed to limit federal funding for abortion care. Effective in 1977, this provision, known as the Hyde Amendment, specifies what abortion services are covered under Medicaid.
Over the past two decades, Congress has debated the limited cir****tances under which federal funding for abortion should be allowed. For a brief period of time, coverage included cases of rape, incest, life endangerment, and physical health damage to the woman. However, beginning in 1979, the physical health exception was excluded, and in 1981 rape and incest exceptions were also excluded.
In September 1993, Congress rewrote the provision to include Medicaid funding for abortions in cases where the pregnancy resulted from rape or incest. The present version of the Hyde Amendment requires coverage of abortion in cases of rape, incest, and life endangerment.
So am I to understand that they are trying to take funding away for abortion in cases of rape, incest, and life endangerment? This would be so horribly wrong.
While I might hesitate to advocate the use of federal dollars for abortions of convenience, especially when they are used as a method of birth control, I would be so ashamed to deny an abortion to someone who needed one in the case of rape, incest, and life endangerment.
Though I could never imagine myself having an abortion under normal cir****tances, I darn sure would in the event of a pregnancy that was the result of rape, incest, or life endangerment.
Again, than you so much for the education!!!
Yes, some lawmakers are trying to make it difficult if not impossible to get an abortion under any cir****tance. Here in Indiana we had a lawmaker who argued that women would lie about being raped to get an abortion, as if women are just running around getting pregnant just so we can all have abortions.
"Life is not about waiting for the
storms to pass...it's about learning
how to dance in the rain."
Raising my hand! Growing up in the Bronx with an overly religious mother I was unaware that sex existed. If it wasn't for PP when I was in high school, I probably would have been a single mother on welfare, or one of those girls delivering babies in the school toilet and leaving them there.
Thank you PP, for educating me on my reproductive health, and for giving the birth control that helped my terrible periods, and prevented me from getting pregnant well into my early twenties!