OT - Attn: Handbag junkies - give me your opinion
I'm leaning towards #2. It's hard to see from the photo, but the stitching on the side is it's best feature, giving it a kind of "biker/edgy" look. I was too lazy to dig the interweb to post the photo that would have showed it more. I'm leaning towards it also, because it's bigger and I need room to put my chit, and my other D&B is a drawstring too. I can't afford to get many so I must diversify! But, in the end, I'd be happy with either.
-Cynthia
There are never any problems, only solutions. quoted by a dear and special friend!!!
My stats:
Starting weight 234 lbs Height 5 ft 6 in
Goal in 7 months (127 lbs)
Currently: 120-123 lbs
Tops Small Bottoms size 2!!!! UPDATED: 11/11
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/185b6/185b69be1228ef982b6dd19ed1998577a03da1b0" alt=""
Life isn't about waiting for the storm to pass...It's about learning to dance in the rain.
I'm glad I didn't see it, $595 is a lotta sushi dinners. I do like the white and off white bags out now.
I like D&B because many of their styles don't emblazon their name all over them. The name plate is pretty small on these bags. I want something that looks good, I'm not interested in advertising for them. In fact, I didn't even mention what kind of bags these were. You ladies are pretty savvy.
-Cynthia