DS math
Prolly cuz he believes this:
"Some people like the thought of being able to eat more, which is true. But that leads me to ask, why are you getting the surgery? Is it to make a positive change in your life? If so, then shouldn't one be eating healthier anyway? To think that one might choose this operation over gastric bypass simply because they can eat more afterward might be the wrong attitude."
And not this:
"In our view, morbid obesity is a metabolic disease that extends beyond uncontrolled appetite and abnormal food intake. For the past 25 years, our goal has been to change the basic physiology of these patients, allowing for excess weight loss, maintenance of weight loss and continuation of a normal life. We consider that it is important for quality of life to be able to eat normally. We felt that it was preferable not to concentrate our effort on food restriction, giving a false impression that the only problem is a lack of control of food intake, but rather to target correction of the metabolic dysfunction. In these patients, the difficulty has never been to attain weight loss, but to maintain that weight loss. Morbid obesity should be considered a chronic disease, which requires treatment for life."
Now, lemme ask you. Which philosophy sounds more "fatty friendly"?