VBG Sucess ????
Thanks
Von
I read that VBG is reversable in an emergency, but not as easily as lap band, and can cause more issues than a lap band because they mess with the stomach itself. Some of the reversals I've heard were frightening.
The upside is that there is no "PORT" to fill and no adjustments that have to be made to continue weight loss. It appears that Lap Banding is the more preferred way the surgeons like to go these days. (or bypass surgery.)
I lost about 70 pounds. from what I've read, that is about what is expected to be lost. My weight is fairly stable, but can fluxuate.
Good luck in your choices!
I would really research the heck out of these surgeries. Look at the long term results for expected amounts of excess weight loss (ewl) and look at the revision forum. See what people are revising from and to. I am revising to the RNY, but that is what my province (BC) will do, BUT if I were to self pay, I would do the DS in a heart beat.
good luck :)
sandi
on 4/6/10 6:47 am - Hawkinsville, GA
My reasons for wanting the DS are many.
First, I have already had a VBG and hated it. It is strictly restrictive and it didn't work for me, they don't really do it anymore because of the failure rate and the complications like getting stuck and vomittig. I don't want the band because I have so much weight to lose and I do see success with the band but not a lot for people with a lot of weight to lose, I do see a lot of banders going for revision/different surgery.
I don't mind the RNY, but it is a combination of restriction and malabsorption. From what I have read/heard there isn't a lot of malabsorption happening to cause a lot of weight loss. Most of the weight loss is caused by the tiny pouch. Because I have had problems with my "pouch" with foods gettig stuck (I do chew a lot) I don't want that again for myself. Also, I have read that revisions tend to lose slower with an RNY, I know it's not all about speed of loss, but in a way it is for me. If I don't see it coming off fairly quickly, I will see that as a failure, and I have already had a failure with the VBG.
With the DS, you get a smaller stomach, but it's not tiny. And you get a lot of malabsorption. Most of the weight loss comes from that. And I do see lots of people going for revisions from the RNY to a distal RNY or a DS. And with me having a revision, I want it to be the last surgery that I will ever have to have. I don't really see anyone having a revision with a DS.
But I live in a province in Canada that doesn't have the DS, and I can only have the RNY or the VSG. but since I have the VBG the VSG is out of the question. Anyway.... I am rambling...But this is just my opinion made up from my experiences. I will have the RnY because I have no other choice (no money to self pay).
I will soon find out if I get the RNY in the States, ( I applied for out of country coverage to have it in Seattle Washington.) You can apply to have OOC if you have a bmi of 50 or more and comorbidities. So we will see, maybe tomorrow. Wish me luck, otherwise I will have to wait up to 5 years for the RNY here in BC. Ugg!
Anyway, have a great day.
Sandi :)
I have never been able to beef, or veggies. However in 2006, it got to the point that I was throwing up every thing that I was eating. Turns out that I could not tolerate anything that had fiber in it, it blocked the opening into the pouch.
Just had RNY because of GERD, which has caused Barrett's Esophagus, which is a precancerous condition, which could lead to esophageal cancer.
I have never been able to get as much protein down as I have since I had surgery. RNY was the best decision for me.