Good news for "lightweights" seeking lap band
FDA Expands Gastric Band Indication |
||||||
|
Do you knew, i am unsure about this! Great if the person has co-morbidities - but it seems to me that this might bring banding closer to being seen as cosmetic surgery. And that would, IMO, be wrong. Banding is a major op with all the risks that entails and there can be, as we all know, later complications resulting from the surgery.
Buit good to see that the FDA voted 8:2 that it wa safe and 8:1 that it was effective!
Highest 290, Banded - 248 Lowest 139 (too thin!). Comfort zone 155-165.
Happily banded since May 2006. Regain of 28lbs 2013-14. ALL GONE!
But some has returned! Up to 175, argh! Off we go again,
We thought there was band bashing before let the games begin....good grief.
Jen
lapband in 2008 at 298lbs , lowest weight was 183lbs , Band almost killed me and removed in 2011. No revison because to much damage for revision.
Anti Lap-band advocate!
Since a BMI of 30 is considered obese, this means that obese folks could have lap bands earlier and perhaps prevent the complications that come with even higher BMIs and morbid or supermorbid obesity.
I would have appreciated having a lap band much sooner, when I was still able to move and had far fewer pounds to lose. I think too that the data bares out that lighter folks with lower BMIs are more successful with the lap band than those like me who started with a BMI of over 48.
No one should have to "fatten up" to have WLS, and I know some who have deliberately gained weight in order to meet the minimum requirement of a BMI of 35, because, like all of us, they were unable to lose weight permanently through diet and exercise.
I'm thinking this policy change could be a good thing.
on 2/17/11 6:18 am
Best wishes to those who struggling with obesity. You have choices and people fighting to help. There is always hope and you are not alone.