x-post: *******s denied me!
I have no problem telling... the post is probably still buried deep around here from back when it happened in Oct/Nov of 2006.
but like I said above, my original denial was then saying the DS was experimental and/or investigational... that it hasn't been "proven" through trials and/or peer reviewed literature to be at least as effective as the other currently available "accepted" procedures like the Band or RNY.
my appeal was basically my collecting all the information I could find showing that the DS WAS an acceptable and as effective as (if not more than) the other popular procedures... I printed out all sorts of medical journal articles, policies of other major insurance companies showing that THEY accept it as a valid procedure, and the recent (at that time) change in medicare's policy allowing the DS.... all in all, my appeal packed consisted of 206 pages.
Like I said above though... that was disproving their claim of the DS being e&i. YOUR company agrees it's as valid of a procedure as RNY or Banding... but your denial is on medical necessity, not e&i. You couldn't get approved for RNY either because you're not at 40+, or 35+ with a qualifying co-morb
but like I said above, my original denial was then saying the DS was experimental and/or investigational... that it hasn't been "proven" through trials and/or peer reviewed literature to be at least as effective as the other currently available "accepted" procedures like the Band or RNY.
my appeal was basically my collecting all the information I could find showing that the DS WAS an acceptable and as effective as (if not more than) the other popular procedures... I printed out all sorts of medical journal articles, policies of other major insurance companies showing that THEY accept it as a valid procedure, and the recent (at that time) change in medicare's policy allowing the DS.... all in all, my appeal packed consisted of 206 pages.
Like I said above though... that was disproving their claim of the DS being e&i. YOUR company agrees it's as valid of a procedure as RNY or Banding... but your denial is on medical necessity, not e&i. You couldn't get approved for RNY either because you're not at 40+, or 35+ with a qualifying co-morb