Obamacare hits home ~
I feel ill; this just makes me sick. We (my company) got the renewal rates for our health care insurance yesterday. We do not have a fancy plan, it doesn't cover any kind of WLS, it has $10.00 co pay for all prescriptions and $15.00 for doctor visits and a $1,000.00 per person deductible, it is not a Cadillac plan by any means. Last year, the premium for me was $886.00 a month, next year is will go up by $500.00 a month. The younger employees; the ones in their 30's only went up $200.00 or so, but still there is no way any of us can pay these rates.
When we quizzed the insurance company about why the huge increase when we have had no major claims, the answer was Obamacare and all the people they now have to cover without being able do anything about pre-existing conditions.
So, we are screwed. We will get some other quotes, but this is looking really ugly and I doubt any small business will be able to have health care insurance for their employees. But then I suppose that was always the plan.
Kerry
When we quizzed the insurance company about why the huge increase when we have had no major claims, the answer was Obamacare and all the people they now have to cover without being able do anything about pre-existing conditions.
So, we are screwed. We will get some other quotes, but this is looking really ugly and I doubt any small business will be able to have health care insurance for their employees. But then I suppose that was always the plan.
Kerry
Yep, we are screwed! I am really glad I had my DS, because WLS will now no longer be covered next year on my plan. Companies will not be able to afford to provide private insurance to their employees in the next few years. We will all be forced to go on the gov't plan. Welcome to LapCorp style healthcare...I was told by friend of a Canadian, that the Canadians are depressed about losing access to our great healthcare.
Ms. Cal Culator
on 8/12/10 12:20 am - Tuvalu
on 8/12/10 12:20 am - Tuvalu
On August 12, 2010 at 7:03 AM Pacific Time, dvanhandel wrote:
Then how come so many come here for our healthcare, including your prime minister??? Isn't that like assuming that medical care is better in Brazil because so many DSers go there? Sometimes people are seeking a particular doctor for a particular reason. It's not a reflection on the health care of the entire country.
But this is:
The World Health Organization's ranking
of the world's health systems.
Source: WHO World Health Report - See also Spreadsheet Details (731kb)
The World Health Organization's ranking of the world's health systems was last produced in 2000, and the WHO no longer produces such a ranking table, because of the complexity of the task.
Rank Country
1 France
2 Italy
3 San Marino
4 Andorra
5 Malta
6 Singapore
7 Spain
8 Oman
9 Austria
10 Japan
11 Norway
12 Portugal
13 Monaco
14 Greece
15 Iceland
16 Luxembourg
17 Netherlands
18 United Kingdom
19 Ireland
20 Switzerland
21 Belgium
22 Colombia
23 Sweden
24 Cyprus
25 Germany
26 Saudi Arabia
27 United Arab Emirates
28 Israel
29 Morocco
30 Canada
31 Finland
32 Australia
33 Chile
34 Denmark
35 Dominica
36 Costa Rica
37 United States of America
38 Slovenia
39 Cuba
40 Brunei
41 New Zealand
42 Bahrain
43 Croatia
44 Qatar
45 Kuwait
46 Barbados
47 Thailand
48 Czech Republic
49 Malaysia
50 Poland
51 Dominican Republic
52 Tunisia
53 Jamaica
54 Venezuela
55 Albania
56 Seychelles
57 Paraguay
58 South Korea
59 Senegal
60 Philippines
61 Mexico
62 Slovakia
63 Egypt
64 Kazakhstan
65 Uruguay
66 Hungary
67 Trinidad and Tobago
68 Saint Lucia
69 Belize
70 Turkey
71 Nicaragua
72 Belarus
73 Lithuania
74 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
75 Argentina
76 Sri Lanka
77 Estonia
78 Guatemala
79 Ukraine
80 Solomon Islands
81 Algeria
82 Palau
83 Jordan
84 Mauritius
85 Grenada
86 Antigua and Barbuda
87 Libya
88 Bangladesh
89 Macedonia
90 Bosnia-Herzegovina
91 Lebanon
92 Indonesia
93 Iran
94 Bahamas
95 Panama
96 Fiji
97 Benin
98 Nauru
99 Romania
100 Saint Kitts and Nevis
101 Moldova
102 Bulgaria
103 Iraq
104 Armenia
105 Latvia
106 Yugoslavia
107 Cook Islands
108 Syria
109 Azerbaijan
110 Suriname
111 Ecuador
112 India
113 Cape Verde
114 Georgia
115 El Salvador
116 Tonga
117 Uzbekistan
118 Comoros
119 Samoa
120 Yemen
121 Niue
122 Pakistan
123 Micronesia
124 Bhutan
125 Brazil
126 Bolivia
127 Vanuatu
128 Guyana
129 Peru
130 Russia
131 Honduras
132 Burkina Faso
133 Sao Tome and Principe
134 Sudan
135 Ghana
136 Tuvalu
137 Ivory Coast
138 Haiti
139 Gabon
140 Kenya
141 Marshall Islands
142 Kiribati
143 Burundi
144 China
145 Mongolia
146 Gambia
147 Maldives
148 Papua New Guinea
149 Uganda
150 Nepal
151 Kyrgystan
152 Togo
153 Turkmenistan
154 Tajikistan
155 Zimbabwe
156 Tanzania
157 Djibouti
158 Eritrea
159 Madagascar
160 Vietnam
161 Guinea
162 Mauritania
163 Mali
164 Cameroon
165 Laos
166 Congo
167 North Korea
168 Namibia
169 Botswana
170 Niger
171 Equatorial Guinea
172 Rwanda
173 Afghanistan
174 Cambodia
175 South Africa
176 Guinea-Bissau
177 Swaziland
178 Chad
179 Somalia
180 Ethiopia
181 Angola
182 Zambia
183 Lesotho
184 Mozambique
185 Malawi
186 Liberia
187 Nigeria
188 Democratic Republic of the Congo
189 Central African Republic
190 Myanmar
www.photius.com/rankings/healthranks.html
I believe that the WHO is talking about access, not technological superiority. And, you tell me, why would the Canadian Prime Minister come to the USA to have heart surgery????
Do you know how many Canadians come to the US to have something done here, they pay cash, because they can't get what they need in Canada. A man I know came here for hip replacement, because he has been on a waiting list for 3 years, told it might be another 2. He came to Chicago, paid cash, had it done within the week.
Universal Health Care is no good if you have to wait for a procedure that you need now. I am a social worker, and I can tell you, I have never seen a poor person have to wait for care. It is my middle class friends who are uninsurable who have issues. And that is where the problem is...That is why we needed reform, which, I do feel we did not get. Yes, we have big problems with insurance companies. I agree.
Do you know how many Canadians come to the US to have something done here, they pay cash, because they can't get what they need in Canada. A man I know came here for hip replacement, because he has been on a waiting list for 3 years, told it might be another 2. He came to Chicago, paid cash, had it done within the week.
Universal Health Care is no good if you have to wait for a procedure that you need now. I am a social worker, and I can tell you, I have never seen a poor person have to wait for care. It is my middle class friends who are uninsurable who have issues. And that is where the problem is...That is why we needed reform, which, I do feel we did not get. Yes, we have big problems with insurance companies. I agree.
Ms. Cal Culator
on 8/12/10 1:44 am - Tuvalu
on 8/12/10 1:44 am - Tuvalu
The WHO rated based on several things...like access and preventable deaths and that kind of thing. Well, the Canadians here seem okay with their system, but it isn't really relevant to the Health Care Bill changes, since we are not going to a Single Payer system like they have.
And they pay cash here and can get ANYTHING done here...you may have noticed that many people who are truly iffy in terms of being able to deal with any wls seem to get surgery...even those who don't know what they had. Have you met Saved Baptist on the MB? And then there was the lap band chick several years ago who didn't realize they were going to cut into her...duh. And in L.A. you cannot escape the commercials for 1-800-get thin...they are still selling lap bands...in spite of the suspended license of one of the brother doctors and the dead patients. But if you have cash or insurance that will cover it, you're in.
I think that the difference is like when I couldn't have behind the wheel Driver's Ed when I was in High School. They ordered class by age...oldest kids first. I didn't turn 16 until the January of my senior year and there were still older kids (juniors, but older) than I was right up until I graduated from high school. I wanted the class. I felt I was owed the class. But I wasn't really going to suffer any damage without it. So, like that highly publicized case where the woman swore she'd go blind and Canada wouldn't do her surgery...and then we found out that her version of her ailment was not at all what the Canadian doctors had to say...and she came here and paid cash and had surgery right away...she could have waited with no damage. She just didn't want to and had the cash to do otherwise.
Ah yes the WHO. And why is it that this "ranking" is 10 years old? From the ranking page here is the quote:
"The World Health Organization's ranking of the world's health systems was last produced in 2000, and the WHO no longer produces such a ranking table, because of the complexity of the task."
I couldn't see how they came to these conclusions or rankings, so they're really meaningless. Are they ranked according to cash cost? Government costs? Taxpayer Costs? Where does the quality of the actual care fit into how these rankings were arrived at? etc. The list begs the answers to these and many more questions so one would know how to use the ranking; as it is displayed, it's less than useless.
This is something the lefties always quote when they're trying to shove universal health care down our throat, but as I said, it has no real world meaning; it's just a left wing talking point.
That being said, I do not like what we have now and I didn't like what we had before Obamacare. Changes need to be made, but what we got was nothing but a huge government power grab. We were lied to and are going to be paying for these lies for a very long time to come IMO.
I just hope every one of the liars who tried to sell this mess get thrown out in November and that the newly elected folks have the guts to repeal the mess and really do something that would help. I don't have much hope that this will happen, but I can dream.
Kerry
"The World Health Organization's ranking of the world's health systems was last produced in 2000, and the WHO no longer produces such a ranking table, because of the complexity of the task."
I couldn't see how they came to these conclusions or rankings, so they're really meaningless. Are they ranked according to cash cost? Government costs? Taxpayer Costs? Where does the quality of the actual care fit into how these rankings were arrived at? etc. The list begs the answers to these and many more questions so one would know how to use the ranking; as it is displayed, it's less than useless.
This is something the lefties always quote when they're trying to shove universal health care down our throat, but as I said, it has no real world meaning; it's just a left wing talking point.
That being said, I do not like what we have now and I didn't like what we had before Obamacare. Changes need to be made, but what we got was nothing but a huge government power grab. We were lied to and are going to be paying for these lies for a very long time to come IMO.
I just hope every one of the liars who tried to sell this mess get thrown out in November and that the newly elected folks have the guts to repeal the mess and really do something that would help. I don't have much hope that this will happen, but I can dream.
Kerry
Ms. Cal Culator
on 8/12/10 1:33 am - Tuvalu
on 8/12/10 1:33 am - Tuvalu
It probably has real meaning if a family member was one of the dead people. It takes a while to compile the figures. The links take you to the methodology.
How about a little more recent:
www.photius.com/rankings/healthranks.html
And this isn't as old:
www.allcountries.org/ranks/preventable_deaths_country_ranks_1997-1998_2002-2003_2008.html
And here's a more recent comparison of six countries...Australia, Canada, Germany, New Zealand, the United Kingdom...and we're in sixth place for outcome and in first place for spending.
www.commonwealthfund.org/Content/Publications/Fund-Reports/2 007/May/Mirror--Mirror-on-the-Wall--An-International-Update- on-the-Comparative-Performance-of-American-Healt.aspx
I've had health care in a few countries. There are good and bad in all of them. Our daughter lived with a Danish family for a semester in college. The dad in that family was a doctor. He thought differently about health care--and taxes--than most American doctors do. But when we visited there, one of his patients, a very elderly woman, died. We had plans for dinner out that night and we all had to sit in the car and wait while he went to the family's home and offered condolences and answered any questions they had. He truly cared.
He didn't make a ton of money. The government told him where his office would be located. He paid a much higher percentage of his income in taxes than we did. But you know...he had more money and more time off and fewer headaches than most American doctors do. He KNEW he'd have an income and a retirement income. He KNEW his kids could go to college. He KNEW he could have six weeks off every year for mental health purposes. He KNEW that none of his patients were eating cat food so they could afford meds...or doing without meds. And, with all this government interference, Danes eat LOTS of butter and rank highest on the "Happiness Scale," whatever that is. It may have to do with the fact that Danish parents don't have to "sacrifice" for their kids and so their kids end up less neurotic. Or it could be all the beer. Either way, it works for millions of people....there and all over the world.
In fact, now that my idiot father died, I'm getting my Italian citizenship paperwork out so that I can get that documented and my kid--when traveling--can have access to a least minimal health care when in Europe.