FIGHT MEDICARE'S RULING ABOUT HOSPITALS!!

ravenscroftceo
on 3/3/06 3:25 am - Puyallup, WA
According to the news and the PA at the surgeon's office where I *had* an appointment for next week, on February 21st the announcement was made that "Medicare would cover some procedures only at hospitals considered "centers for excellence" by the American College of Surgeons and the American Society for Bariatric Surgery." Hospitals were given no time to apply for certification from either organization. We ALL need to contact our federal congressmen and senators about this. The more he11 we raise, the more likely it is the rule will be reversed or revised. Here are some things to point out in your communication (preferably by phone): 1. There was no notice given for this ruling. Hospitals should have had time to apply for certification. 2. Obesity is a life-threatening disease and this ruling has dramatically reduced the facilities available to perform bariatric surgery for months to come. 3. Waivers ARE available and you should urge your politicians to push for a waiver for your particular hospital. Here's the list of US Senators. Just find yours and slam them with emails & phone calls: http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm Here's the list of Congressmen. Ditto above: http://www.congress.org/congressorg/issuesaction/alertlist/?issue=30
debbiebates
on 3/3/06 8:52 am - Chugiak, AK
Thx for the info on "waivers". I hadn't even considered that option. As to the notice, as I understand it, the concept of COE began almost a year ago. But I think many docs thought it wouldn't go thru, at least not nearly so quickly. As eveidenced by the 117 that did get approval there was an application opportunity prior to the hammer coming down. Where I believe M'care really dropped the ball with tragic results is there was insufficient notice to receipients. Bariatric surgery needed way more "press" time, we certainly got enough info on Part D.
ravenscroftceo
on 3/15/06 9:25 am - Puyallup, WA
Hi, everyone. Thanks for your responses. I'd like to clarify a couple of things: First, I was mistaken in thinking that this ruling just popped out of somebody's head. There *was* a comment period on the proposed ruling and so forth; apparently the hospitals knew this might be coming. So if you were in-process for WLS when this ruling came out, I urge you to contact your hospital and your surgeon and tell them that waivers are available. Ask them if they've applied for a waiver. Urge them to do it if they haven't and stay on them until they do. Second, I believe the new rules are *good*, not bad. My objection is only that the ruling didn't give facilities time to get certified, thus leaving so many of us hanging. I received a response from one of you saying that the comment period ended in December of 2005 and that the ruling went into effect in February of 2006. That's not NEARLY enough time for all the WLS facilities to get certified. Who knows how long it takes to get from application to approval? We're talking bureaucracy here, people. Nothing moves quickly. Third, here's concrete proof that this ruling didn't allow enough time to get certified: in the whole USA there are now only 117 facilities certified to perform WLS. Whole areas of the country don't have a certified facility. See which hospitals *are* certified here: http://www.cms.hhs.gov/MedicareApprovedFacilitie/BSF/list.asp#TopOfPage (thanks for the link, those who posted it) One of you pointed out that Medicare recipients should have been notified of the proposed rule; I agree wholeheartedly. Another response pointed out that the hospitals were hoping the rule wouldn't pass, which is why they didn't apply for certification. I disagree. There are just too many hospitals that aren't on the certified list - there can't be that many with their heads in the sand. Someone else suggested that hospitals didn't apply for the certification because it costs them money to get certified. THAT, I believe. I still urge you to contact your lawmakers. I paid to have this issue listed in the Soapbox at congress.org; I'm now asking everyone to PLEASE visit and voice your opinion: http://www.congress.org/congressorg/issues/alert/?alertid=8541136&content_dir=ua_congressorg Thanks, everyone. Lisa Owens
TrinTx
on 3/18/06 11:51 am - Trinity, TX
Hi Lisa, I live in Texas and am usually on another forum, but a misclick sent me to the page with your letter and I just had to respond. I too was slammed by the new ruling. I had gone thru all the pretesting and actually had my surgery scheduled for March the 6th. When the ruling came down, of course it had to be cancelled. My hospital has been in the process of certification for 8 months with no end in sight. Can you tell me more about these waivers? Its something I havent heard about, and maybe it could be helpful. My octors office actually filed an appeal with Medicare to get permission to finish with the patients who already had surgery scheduled, and they were turned down within a week. So if the waivers you talked about are something diferent I would be very interested in the info. Thanx in advance for any help you can offer. Good luck with your journey. Lisa Locke
Most Active
×