Question:
What about the length of the common channel?
Now I am really confused!!! I am considering using BTC in Illinois, but, I read s concern about the length of the common channel. It was said that BTC leaves a common channel of 200 cm? And a reply was "200 cm on the common channel is way too long" and would keep you from losing weight! They said it should be somewhere around 100 cm, if I remember the post correctly. I don't know what I should do now...try to go ahead with BTC or go somewhere else? PLEASE HELP ME!!! — Richard P. (posted on April 16, 2003)
April 16, 2003
I do not know what other post you are referring to but I had a lengthy
discussion with and individual on a support group about how long the small
intestine is and how much is left after which surgeries. I verified last
week with my surgeon that I was in the ballpark. The actual length of
small intestine varies by individual as it is proportionate to your height,
but most people run in the 20' range, which is 600cm. So when you have
150cm bypassed for a RNY you have 450cm of common channnel. If you have a
DS procedure usually everyting is bypassed but the last 24-48", which
is the length of the common channel - 60 to 120cm.
<p>I believe where part of the problem comes in is that the small
intestine is actually made of up 3 sections and I'm not sure when people
quote numbers that they are talking aobut the total of all 3 sections,
which I am when I say approx. 600cm. My understanding is that the BTC's in
Ill do RNY's only. If they are doing 400cm bypasses I would be concerned
as that like 12', which is a very long bypass for an RNY and an awful lot
of malabsorption. However, if they are doing this but with a very large
pouch then it might not be so weird. However, most surgeons do a max 150cm
bypass with RNY's but I have hear of some as long as 300cm but never
400cm.
<p>You need to talk to them because I truly think terminology is
mixed up here. I am a 150cm bypass and therefore have at least a 450cm
common channnel and maybe longer because I am tall. I have a 1/2 ounce
pouch to go with my long (but typical) common channel. For your own peace
of mind call and talk to them. Chris
— zoedogcbr
April 16, 2003
Hi Richard! I had my surgery at the BTC in Illinois and can guarentee to
you that they ONLY will bypass 150 cm. then end...leaving the common
channel approx. 450 cm. For BTC, It's the same procedure no matter if you
weight 200 or 400 pounds. It's what they've found to work the best for
everyone and what they stick to. Good luck!!!
— Christie N.
April 17, 2003
Although the average small bowel length for a human adult may be 600cm,
published studies indicate that it may be significantly longer for morbidly
obese WLS patients -- more than 700cm (with a lot of individual variation,
which does not necessarily correlate with variations in height). In the DS
and in very distal RNY procedures, surgeons measure how much intestine will
be left in the alimentary tract, not how much is bypassed. The typical DS
leaves a 100 cm common channel, a 150 cm Roux limb, and all the rest goes
in the bilio-pancreatic limb (~450+ cm). Some patients with very distal
RNYs have similar intestinal measurements. In contrast, proximal RNY
surgeons don't tend to talk about common channels. Instead, they report how
much intestine will be bypassed. It's important to ask what they mean by
"bypassed," however. Some seem to be talking about the Roux limb
(food travels through it, but bile and pancreatic enzymes
"bypass" this portion of the bowel), and some seem to be talking
about the bilio-pancreatic limb (just the opposite -- digestive fluids
travel through it, but food bypasses this limb). Your Roux limb and your
common channel together make up your alimentary tract. The shorter your
alimentary tract is made, the more malabsorption you'll have (overall, but
esp. of protein and carbs). The shorter your common channel, the more
malabsorption of fats you'll have. However, since the proximal RNY relies
much more heavily on restriction than malabsorption for its results, it's
not really critical to have a short alimentary limb. I hope this helps. I
know it's all very confusing, but you're already on the right track by
asking questions and working hard to fully understand your options. Good
luck!
— Tally
Click Here to Return